zarusthra Posted May 1, 2010 Posted May 1, 2010 Here are some pics of first - EK1 No marks other than 900 And it is 3 piece and it is magnetic Any ideas on time of make etc....
zarusthra Posted May 1, 2010 Author Posted May 1, 2010 Here are some pics of first - EK1 No marks other than 900 And it is 3 piece and it is magnetic Any ideas on time of make etc.... Here is the backside - non vaulted - very flat and right dimensions and weight
zarusthra Posted May 1, 2010 Author Posted May 1, 2010 Here is my EK2 Appears to be a type a - not painted but has the blackened look! No markings Any idea of the maker?
Motorhead Posted May 2, 2010 Posted May 2, 2010 The first class is a bad copy! The 2nd class could be better-can you post some bigger pics? Micha
zarusthra Posted May 2, 2010 Author Posted May 2, 2010 Well I thought so on the 1st class - being painted - being too new (I have handled enough old stuff to sniff out age!) plus I got it for basically a copy price! (If it had been real I would have been quite excited but was pretty sure it was not when I got it) What quick ways do you use to determine? I have looked at a number of supposedly reputable dealers 1870 ek1's and I have to say a lot of them look awfully questionable for 1000 to 2000 dollars! Here are more pics of the EK2 - which when you have both in yours hands is everything the EK1 is not! Definately blackened not painted and looks very very type A - no ninth bead etc. - it feels 140 years old
zarusthra Posted May 2, 2010 Author Posted May 2, 2010 Well I thought so on the 1st class - being painted - being too new (I have handled enough old stuff to sniff out age!) plus I got it for basically a copy price! (If it had been real I would have been quite excited but was pretty sure it was not when I got it) What quick ways do you use to determine? I have looked at a number of supposedly reputable dealers 1870 ek1's and I have to say a lot of them look awfully questionable for 1000 to 2000 dollars! Here are more pics of the EK2 - which when you have both in yours hands is everything the EK1 is not! Definately blackened not painted and looks very very type A - no ninth bead etc. - it feels 140 years old
zarusthra Posted May 2, 2010 Author Posted May 2, 2010 http://gmic.co.uk/uploads/monthly_05_2010/post-9034-127280948376.jpghttp://gmic.co.uk/uploads/monthly_05_2010/post-9034-127280948376.jpg
zarusthra Posted May 2, 2010 Author Posted May 2, 2010 http://gmic.co.uk/uploads/monthly_05_2010/post-9034-127280948376.jpghttp://gmic.co.uk/uploads/monthly_05_2010/post-9034-127280948376.jpg Last pic Hope these give enough details!
Motorhead Posted May 2, 2010 Posted May 2, 2010 Not a really sharp picture,but it looks so far ok to me. Micha
zarusthra Posted May 2, 2010 Author Posted May 2, 2010 Thanks I compared it to all the ek2 pics of confirmed good and looks like a type A - of course do not have another one to check the feel but there is no way to fake the feel of a period item! At least my experience with other items
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now