Mervyn Mitton Posted March 7, 2012 Posted March 7, 2012 Dated 1791 this George2 3rd. coin is about the size of an old shilling. It has been drilled to use as a pendant. Appearance is Gold - but, doesn't seem heavy enough. Your thoughts will be appreciated. http://gmic.co.uk/uploads/monthly_03_2012/post-6209-0-50755300-1331131326.jpgCLICK TO ENLARGE
Mervyn Mitton Posted March 7, 2012 Author Posted March 7, 2012 THE REVERSE http://gmic.co.uk/uploads/monthly_03_2012/post-6209-0-39759500-1331131543.jpgCLICK TO ENLARGE
Mervyn Mitton Posted March 7, 2012 Author Posted March 7, 2012 The second coin - 1869 - head of young Victoria http://gmic.co.uk/uploads/monthly_03_2012/post-6209-0-32262400-1331131665.jpgCLICK TO ENLARGE
Mervyn Mitton Posted March 7, 2012 Author Posted March 7, 2012 THIS HAS VERY STRANGE WORDING - ALMOST LIKE AN EXPERIMENTAL ONE ? http://gmic.co.uk/uploads/monthly_03_2012/post-6209-0-65160900-1331132364.jpgclick to enlarge
Mervyn Mitton Posted March 9, 2012 Author Posted March 9, 2012 Pete - thankyou for your suggestion. The later one is strange - that I could see as a token. However, the older one appears to be a coin - surely that could not be used as a token ? Mervyn
Wood Posted March 9, 2012 Posted March 9, 2012 Hi Mervyn, You may be right on the last one, I didn't read the wording. Never, I believe, produced in this format as a coin. Next time I see him I will ask my mate, he is a coin and token officianado, afficianado, anyway he collects them. Regards, Pete
Mervyn Mitton Posted March 9, 2012 Author Posted March 9, 2012 His advice will be much appreciated . Mervyn
Mervyn Mitton Posted March 22, 2012 Author Posted March 22, 2012 A visitor to the shop - a British coin dealer - identified these as being Christmas Cracker gifts from the 20's or 30's. Apparantly they were made and put into small paper rolls - they were then the gift when the Cracker was pulled. They are brass and the children used them for games - or, as pretend money. We learn something every day !
paul wood Posted March 22, 2012 Posted March 22, 2012 A visitor to the shop - a British coin dealer - identified these as being Christmas Cracker gifts from the 20's or 30's. Apparantly they were made and put into small paper rolls - they were then the gift when the Cracker was pulled. They are brass and the children used them for games - or, as pretend money. We learn something every day ! Mervyn, I am afraid that the coin dealer has it wrong. The first piece known as a "Birmingham Sovereign" is an imitation of a regal guinea, these were made in the early 19th century and the legends were changed from the correct ones found on the official issues in order to avoid potential forgery charges. They originally came in tubes of 50 or 100 and were used as gambling chips for card games and the like. The same is true for the model half sovereign, these were issued bearing various dates from the 1840's to 1870's and served the same role as the imitation guinea. The originals of these were issued in about 1841 as commemoratives for the birth of Albert Edward Prince of Wales, again, I suspect they were sold in 50's or 100's but unlike the earlier piece I have never encountered an original tube. As to value, I am afraid virtually nothing. Hope this is of help, All the best, Paul
Mervyn Mitton Posted March 25, 2012 Author Posted March 25, 2012 Thankyou for going to all of this trouble, Paul. Unless thay had been gold I wasn't worried about value - it was the mystery of their origin. When Bob is next in S.A. ( you probably know him ?) I shall have great pleasure in telling him their true history. Actually, either story makes them unusual. Many thanks. Mervyn
paul wood Posted March 26, 2012 Posted March 26, 2012 Thankyou for going to all of this trouble, Paul. Unless thay had been gold I wasn't worried about value - it was the mystery of their origin. When Bob is next in S.A. ( you probably know him ?) I shall have great pleasure in telling him their true history. Actually, either story makes them unusual. Many thanks. Mervyn Mervyn, The man formally of Englands Lane Hampstead and latterly at Leighton-Buzzard, who's company name was of a piscean nature. Give old "honest" Bob my best when you see him, he will remember me from my Sotheby's days. Paul
Mervyn Mitton Posted March 27, 2012 Author Posted March 27, 2012 Will do - thanks for your help Paul.
ukok Posted July 11, 2012 Posted July 11, 2012 Mervyn, I am afraid that the coin dealer has it wrong. The first piece known as a "Birmingham Sovereign" is an imitation of a regal guinea, these were made in the early 19th century and the legends were changed from the correct ones found on the official issues in order to avoid potential forgery charges. They originally came in tubes of 50 or 100 and were used as gambling chips for card games and the like. The same is true for the model half sovereign, these were issued bearing various dates from the 1840's to 1870's and served the same role as the imitation guinea. The originals of these were issued in about 1841 as commemoratives for the birth of Albert Edward Prince of Wales, again, I suspect they were sold in 50's or 100's but unlike the earlier piece I have never encountered an original tube. As to value, I am afraid virtually nothing. Hope this is of help, All the best, Paul I concur I've seen many, many hundreds of these and heard several different theories, one being they were used in early versions of Monopoly !!!!!??? I've been fortunate to find a couple of original grubby guineas dismissed as tokens ( even with dirt the difference should be very obvious ) but usually it is the opposite - people thinking they have something of value when they are readily available and usually worthless.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now