Jump to content
News Ticker
  • I am now accepting the following payment methods: Card Payments, Apple Pay, Google Pay and PayPal
  • Latest News

    Recommended Posts

    Posted

    The following photograph shows a member of Freiwilliges Jäger-Bataillon Schill with the distinctive eagle head collar insignia, one of the best and most impressive looking Freikorps insignia made if you ask me. On his belt he wears a Grabendolch with a officer troddel and a rarely seen pistole holster made from cloth. This snapshot could be made on military grounds but i like to picture it being just in the backyard from where he lives. Not sure what the black marking denotes on his right shoulder, most likely it is just an attempt to colour in a damaged spot of the photograph. Sadly, like quite a few of the photographs that i own, there is nothing on the back of this photograph other than the mentioning of the photograph developing company.

    Freikorps Schill a 2.jpg

    Freikorps Schill b.jpg

    Freikorps Schill c.jpg

    Posted

    Fantastic photograph, thank you for showing it. Like these eagle heads of Schill i wonder why Freikorps units chose that specific design they ended up using, who proposed the design? Where were these insignia produced, locally or by a factory who made Pickelhaube insignia for example? Sometimes you can observe a few individuals with their Freikorps unit insignia and a few that lack it(like your photograph), are they still waiting for the insignia to be made and arrive or do they lack the funds? Could it be that they still needed to earn their "stripes" before obtaining the unit insignia?

    Posted (edited)

    Some early Freikorps insignia was off the shelf from existing stocks. A good example of this is the oakleaf collar badge worn by Freiwilliges Landjägerkorps, a readily available insignia worn by many hunt clubs in Germany. I don't think there is any currently available information about who manufactured most of the specialized Freikorps insignia. I assume that information originally existed in the Freikorps archives which were destroyed in a bombing raid in 1944. I would guess that manufacturers that supplied Imperial uniform insignia made some of it. Some well-known manufacturers like Deschler, Godet, Wagner, Fleck, AWS, Timm, St&L and Beco made Freikorps insignia. Deschler, for example made most of the Bavarian Freikorps insignia. Heinrich Timm was a major manufacturer of both Freikorps insignia and awards. But generally it's hard to know who made a lot of it.

     

    Here is a generic insignia catalogue from the period showing hunting and gun club insignia adopted by Freikorps units.

     

    Insigniacatalogueannotated.thumb.jpg.791904c0dce9be9ee6ee56ad7d1a3005.jpg

    Edited by bolewts58
    Posted

    Those oak leaves and acorn type, including variation versions, are very commonly seen in all sorts of Freikorps units, so going by your information i assume they adopted it because it was readily available and the easiest and quickest way to distinguish themselves from same field gray wearing reds? Many wear in addition to the oak leaves and acorn collar insignia a dedicated Freikorps unit insignia, so even though they have by then insignia of their own many kept the oak leaves and acorn type insignia on their collar. Going alone by that page you showed there a quite a few symbols used by Freikorps as their insignia except the Roe deer. The second row also shows:

    Einwohnerwehr Bayern - Fichtelgebirgsgau

    Freikorps Eulenburg

    Posted (edited)
    3 hours ago, Eiserne Wehr said:

    The second row also shows:

    Einwohnerwehr Bayern - Fichtelgebirgsgau

    Freikorps Eulenburg

    These are just buttons, IMO never used by Freikorps, even if the design resembles somehow the Freikorps insignia you mentioned. But, its not the same. The stag is far more elaborate and the Eagle is holding nothing in his hands.

     

    I doubt a small insignia like the oak leave collar tabs would have served the purpose to distinct the own men in combat. Whats for sure was used for this purpose it the swastika worn by Marinebrigade Loewenfeld onto the left side of the helmet during the Red Ruhr Uprising. But it was cast-off very quick, because it did not succeed for the purpose of distinction. 

    4.thumb.jpg.bb46367bbd0955249661503602ec02ca.jpg

     

    So, from this, its to assume the arrow worn by Jäger-Battalion 37 (Roßbach) at front and side of the helmet, served the same purpose. Klietmann suggests this in his work on Roßbach.

    And also the white armbands worn in late 1918 and early 1919 in Berlin an Munich, might have served this purpose. The "Reds" wore red armbands at this time. During the Munich soviet Republic and the Uprising in Wilhelmshaven.

    Unbenannt1.thumb.JPG.e393b1d092fe3719525230be9569b014.JPGUnbenannt.thumb.JPG.980c80f1063e76d01af19f1dd25d9576.JPG

    Out of:

    https://www.armeemuseum.de/images/publikationen/2018_Katalog_Friedensbeginn_online.pdf

     

    Perhaps also the SSOS armband served the distinct purpose. It was widely worn by the Selbstschutz, but seems to have been not mandatory, because Klietmann mentioned for the Schwarze-Schar Bergerhoff they did not wore it.

     

    The small insignia, like the oak leaves collar were IMO mostly worn because of pride, see this period ad for the Landesjägerkorps. Its mentioning the oak leaves collar and that they are troops under the command of Noske.

    s-l1600.thumb.webp.7ba621182270c9881526357b8bacb0f5.webp

     

     

    Edited by Bernd_W

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now
    ×
    ×
    • Create New...

    Important Information

    We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.