I never meant to imply that that historians should be part of some reclusive monastic order. I wasn't talking about the intellectual "products" of historians, not by any stretch of the imagination. I'm all for historians being able to make money from their intellectual products. Heck, I wish I could. What I was referring to was the objects... A historian is going to look at one of these objects, and the historial significance will be where he or she places the greatest value. An investor looks at one of these objects and views the item as a ingot of gold, a savings bond, or a beanie baby. To the investor, the historical significance matters most as a sort of marketing tool that will someday leverage them a better return. --Chris