Jump to content
News Ticker
  • I am now accepting the following payment methods: Card Payments, Apple Pay, Google Pay and PayPal
  • Latest News

    new world

    Valued Member
    • Posts

      1,187
    • Joined

    • Last visited

    • Days Won

      1

    Posts posted by new world

    1. On 10/12/2018 at 16:28, Graf said:

      Hi New Word,

       

      For me it does matter.

      If the Dealer did it it is too bad If a lonely collector did it it point to creating purely  fantasy item

      Any way No point arguing here  Our role is to detect any fakes or unusual items and list it for discussions and to warn the members

      Best

      "If the Dealer did it it is too bad If a lonely collector"

      Whoever did it - those stones do not belong there.

      I think we can agree this was not done by the person receiving the award. This was given for acts of bravery and owner was an officer, this type of modification would result in jokes and mockery from his fellow officers. 

       

       

       

    2. It doesn't really matter who did the "enhancement", what matters is that it was not official and does not belong to this award.

      It certainly does not add to value of it, quite the opposite - it decreases the value.

      Dealer put this on an auction and attached description to it which implied that this is some sort of improvement. The price is already above the price for what these crosses normally sell for.   

       

    3. For sale by a dealer:

      Военна ордена на смелостта, Гранд Крос. Instituted in 1880. Grade I with 1915-1917. In silvered bronze with red and white enamels, with four glass stones embedded in each handle of the crossed swords, measuring 48.5 mm (w) x 48.5 mm (h), vertical pinback, intact enamels, scattered silvering wear, near extremely fine.

      Note that stones were attached to already worn award (see how silver plating is worn out and bronze metal is visible right under the stones). This is a sure sign that stones were applied later, after this medal was worn quite a bit. 

      This was done long after this was awarded, likely it is a modern addition, to increase value of the award.  

      m182_2179.jpg

      m182_2182.jpg

      m182_2185.jpg

    4. I am a bit puzzled by this stamp, as CF Zimmermann did not put full name of their firm on German awards, normally it's a number 20 as I recall. On WWII German (DKIG, various badges, etc) awards you can see underside of the pin marked "20" which is the code number for C.F. Zimmermann, Pforzheim.

      On the other hand, here's similar St Alexander star with diamonds with same stamp, sold by Spink. No photo of the stamp, but description mentions same stamp to the pin:

      A spectacular diamond-set star of the Bulgarian Military Division of the Order of St. Alexander

      Bulgaria, Principality, Order of St. Alexander, Military Division, Star, by C. F. Zimmermann, Pforzheim, 84mm, gold, silver-gilt, siver and enamel, enhanced with approximately 848 'diamonds', maker's name to retaining pin, nearly extremely fine and of the finest quality

      The overall quality of this Star illustrates the supreme experience and detail undertaken by the craftsmen in the workshops of Zimmermann. Each stone upon the rays is individually set into a pierced silver frame; in this material to accentuate the natural colour of the stones. Besides this a sliver-thin pierced gold plate is painstakingly affixed and pierced to align with the pierced silver plate, allowing light to the stones whilst ensuring the reverse of the Star is as attractive as possible at the same time alleviating any tarnish being transferred to the uniform of the recipient in time.

       

       

      17003_14_1.jpg

      Zimmermann markings on German Iron Crosses:

      C.F. Zimmermann / Pforzheim

      20 & 800

       http://www.medalnet.net/Iron_Cross.htm

    5. Seller of these supposedly Rothe stars is based in Austria, which could mean something if these awards were manufactured post-war.

      One factor in favor of this theory is lack of proper F Rothe stamps, as finished awards were all endorsed with such stamps.

      One of the main mysteries are enamels. Enamels on these awards seem to be real hard baked type enamel, which are extremely difficult to replicate. It's possible though that someone found supply of already made parts (center of the star) with enamels already applied, but never assembled.

       

    6. 2 hours ago, ilieff said:

      Good question. 

      I'd assume a generic 1st class badge for this period (presumably Austrian-made (Rothe?) ). 

      I've had a quick look at my image archive and noticed that the majority of cases where those diamond-cut stars appear, it's usually a member of the royal family who wears them. This supports Graf's theory of the stars being used by/given to [exclusively] the highest of the high-ranking people.

      Attached image shows two types of necklace sets - 1) with the so called 'Tsar' crown, worn by prince Cyril (c. 1909) and of the young Prince Ferdinand - example with crossed swords and earlier period crown suspension (c. 1888). Another examples of such stars which I came across are photos of King Boris III (both as King and heir to the Throne) and His mother Marie-Louise who only wore the diamond-cut stars without any necklaces/sashes.

      comp.png

      Thank you!

      In post #69 Graf said "Notice the Swords they are mounted upside down" - that's exactly what we see in the 2nd photo you posted. It seems to be identical star to the one in the Romanoff's book.

       

    7. On 03/05/2018 at 04:54, Igor Ostapenko said:

      MG Ivan Fichev , white cross on the neck , without star of Order 

       

       

      Igor, I don't think it means white cross on the neck without a star is 100% 3rd class.

      Look at this photo of General Kisov - he's wearing white cross only, which is from his 2nd class set. The photo is from 1930s (he became General Lieutenant in 1930). 

      GK_1.jpg

      Next earlier photo is of him wearing the same white neck cross, this time star is present.

      GK_2.jpg

      Finally, photo of him wearing his green 3rd class cross, before being awarded with 2nd class set.

      GK_3.jpg

      The point I am trying to make - people wore 2nd classes with and without the star, it's not that easy to determine which class a person is wearing. We can't say just by looking at the photos - white cross, no star - certainly 3rd class. 

    8. Professor Petko Pavlov passed away. 

      He was well known scientist, awards enthusiast and researcher. Many of you know him as author of the most complete and famous catalog on Bulgarian awards (1st and 2nd editions):

      Besides this collector's bible, he also authored other books on Bulgarian awards and badges.

      His work contributed greatly to research, categorization and popularization of Bulgarian Royal and Communist period awards. He was frequently mentioned in the posts on this forum. 

      This is really sad news, he was great historian, true to his values, committed to his family, and an example of integrity for all and we always felt a deep sense of respect for him. 
       
      Our sincerest condolences to the Pavlov family and friends during this difficult time, our hearts and prayers are with them.
       
      He will be truly missed.

      P1310619.JPG

      P1310621.JPG

      His authographed books

      P1310622.JPG

      P1310624.JPG

      P1310625.JPG

    ×
    ×
    • Create New...

    Important Information

    We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.