Jump to content
News Ticker
  • I am now accepting the following payment methods: Card Payments, Apple Pay, Google Pay and PayPal
  • Latest News

    Alex K

    Valued Member
    • Posts

      2,567
    • Joined

    • Last visited

    • Days Won

      1

    Posts posted by Alex K

    1. I think it's generally taken to mean a fake, (Wring one's hands in anguish for buying a dud/clunker/lemon etc)

       

      The piece may be one of the very latest (And good) generation of fakes doing the rounds

       

      I could of course be completely wrong:o

       

      regards

    2. Hi all, just a long overdue update on this thread, since I posted the examples of the Knights classes, I've added, the following to my collection, A nice Royal officers cross, a Royal 3rd class Commanders cross, and just for fun, spotted an Republic officers cross.

      The Commanders cross has the same "BG" mark in exactly the same place as the Knight's cross I originally posted, still don't know what it means, though.

      The republic officer's is very "Blingy" in comparison but has some amazing enamel work

      Attached updated images

      regards

      CSC_1227 copy1000.JPG

      hungmerit officer.JPG

      Untitled-1 copy.JPG

      Untitled-2 copy.JPG

    3. Hi all, just a quick question, is the attached a "Current" version? described as IV class but I think it's V class, if so any idea of value?

       

      regards

       

      Alex K

      sun1.jpg

      sun2.jpg

      sun3.jpg

      sun4.jpg

    4. 9 minutes ago, Eric Gaumann said:

      Yeah, that's exactly what it is; an EK2.  RK had the suspension loop parallel to the frame, EK2 loops are perpendicular (see image).  That's not to say it wasn't worn that way (as a RK); there were instances of that happening in WW2.  But unless there is some seriously solid provenance proving that it's just an EK2

      3REKs.jpg

      Agreed, they certainly were worn that way during the war, normally by those that had received their preliminary notification, but not their actual award, or those that chose not to have their award damaged in combat, normally there would be some evidence of wear either on the medal itself, or on the ribbon, press studs, ribbon ties etc, the one originally posted doesn't seem to show any of such examples, so it's anyone guess when it became a Pseudo RK in my opinion

       

      regards

      Alex

    ×
    ×
    • Create New...

    Important Information

    We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.