Jump to content
News Ticker
  • I am now accepting the following payment methods: Card Payments, Apple Pay, Google Pay and PayPal
  • Latest News

    Ed_Haynes

    For Deletion
    • Posts

      14,343
    • Joined

    • Last visited

    • Days Won

      25

    Posts posted by Ed_Haynes

    1. This raises some interesting questions, and makes us focus on the fuzzy boundary zone between phaleristics and numismatics.

      -- If one's focus is on these things as history (phaleristics) anything that wasn't awarded and isn't somehow linkable to the recipient (by being named or numbered or at least potentially researchable) is of only limited interest. Items that cannot by their very nature be attributed or researched (e.g., a Third Reich Knight's Cross of the Iron Cross) or was never awarded (e.g., surplus stock sold off by the Mongolian State Bank) are, at best, of only limited interest. For those of this doctrinal persuasion, the preservation of groups is an absolute necessity. The recent research-based ability to reinstill history into some (but by no means all) pre-1918 German medal groups brings them, I guess, into the lower ranges of this category?

      -- If one's focus is on these things as things (numismatics), with no more focused historical content than, say, a coin of Diocletian might hold. This mode of study focuses on such issues as design history (including prototypes), numbers awarded (or not, the difference is only technical here), or the evolution of detailed typologies of awards (e.g. type 3.5.29.4 awarded from March to May of 1953). That an award may have been awarded to an identifiable individual or be part of a group is something between a fact of mild interest and a nagging inconvenience (in that groups may include things of only marginal interest). The question as to whether an award is of contemporary manufacture to the period of award may (Third Reich German) or may not (U.S. awards) be of great concern, though it can give rise to extensive and often animated debate and discussion.

      Many of us (myself included) are apostates, gleefully transgressing the boundary separating these categories and mixing aspects of both doctrinal traditions (personally, I'm maybe 80% phaleristics, 15% numismatics, 5% magpie collector of sparkly things that grab my interest).

    2. Do not NOT NOT miss:

      1- Central Armed Forces Museum

      2- Museum of Contemporary Soviet History - Former Central Museum of the October Revolution (stuff from the deserted and sad Lenin Museum)

      In that order.

      Museum of the Great Patriotic War is worth visiting for the ambience and architecture, less for the medals (mainly fake).

      And, of course, Red Square. Just to be there. Have a vodka across Red Square from Lenin's Tomb and ponder how things have changed.

    ×
    ×
    • Create New...

    Important Information

    We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.