Jump to content
News Ticker
  • I am now accepting the following payment methods: Card Payments, Apple Pay, Google Pay and PayPal
  • Latest News

    hucks216

    Moderator
    • Posts

      3,591
    • Joined

    • Last visited

    • Days Won

      8

    Posts posted by hucks216

    1. I suppose it could be plausible but why wouldn't he of just kept the front cover (and the first page) of the Soldbuch that would of already had a photo & details of him on it? It is the first time I have seen a date stamp like that to authenticate anything as the rest I have seen have been denazified eagle stamps and if he was already a PoW by this stage why isn't it an Allied equivalent? But obviously how can we know for sure what the circumstances were on the day.

      At the end of the day it is an item that would be hard to prove or disprove either way and my gut feeling says 60:40 that this is ok.

    2. They look to be very nice examples and a nice very late war EK citation. The Reinhardt signature looks correct for his one (I have his signature many times and it matches them all pretty much). The Manteuffel one looks different from the one I have from his 1944 GD days in that this one looks shorter (see the example in the Signature Database) but having said that I still think it is a good example.

    3. It is good that you have been able to keep hold of items belonging to your relative.

      I have seen similar citations - not SA related though as I don't really keep an eye out for SA stuff - and most units throughout Germany from youth organisations and upwards held many sporting & cultural events and issued citations for the first three winners in various competitions.

    4. If you wish to display it then glass is a good way, as long as it is the type that can protect it from the sun's rays, otherwise an acid-free sleeve (although that would depend on the size obviously. But it has survived 70 years folded up and as long as it isn't folded and refolded constantly it should be ok for another few years yet.

      As for the bombing of Hannover, again taken from the Bomber Command War Diaries, it states that for the first raid visibility was good but stronger than forecast winds caused to the marking and bombing to be concentrated between 2-5 miles SSE of the city centre.

      For the second raid, again faulty forecast winds saved the centre of Hannover but the very concentrated bombing fell on an area 5 miles north of the city centre. Apparantly, RAF photographic data showed that most of the bombs fell in open country or in the villages north of the city.

    5. That's an interesting piece of paper. There was a raid on Hannover on the night of the 22nd/23rd September which saw the loss of 31 aircraft from 7, 9, 10, 51, 57, 76, 77, 78, 90, 101, 102, 115, 158, 207, 214, 218, 428, 432, 434 & 460 Squadrons. An additional note of interest for that raid is that one of the aircrew shot down that night, F/O Pohe (RNZAF), went on to take part in The Great Escape in March 1944, was recaptured and was one of the 50 executed.

      The raid on the night of 27th/28th September was even more costly for the bombers with 48 aircraft being lost from 7, 10, 15, 35, 50, 51, 61, 75, 76, 77, 78, 90, 101, 103, 106, 149, 156, 158,166, 196, 199, 214, 218, 405, 428, 432, 434, 460, 620 & 622 Squadrons.

      (Source: RAF Bomber Command Losses Of The Second World War - 1943)

      The Bomber Command War Diaries states that 711 aircraft took part in the first raid, which was the first raid on Hannover in 2 years, and also saw 5 USAAF B-17's taking part in the first American night raid on Germany. It states that 26 aircraft were lost. Maybe the discrepancy is due to aircraft making it back to the UK but crashing on landing?

      For the second raid, the War Diaries book states that 678 aircraft took part in the raid with 38 being lost, including one B-17 (again, 5 USAAF B-17's participated).

    ×
    ×
    • Create New...

    Important Information

    We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.