Jump to content
News Ticker
  • I am now accepting the following payment methods: Card Payments, Apple Pay, Google Pay and PayPal
  • Latest News

    JapanX

    Valued Member
    • Posts

      22,214
    • Joined

    • Last visited

    • Days Won

      67

    Posts posted by JapanX

    1. Nick,

      Interesting, I have a friend in Flensburg who claims that some of the bronze-gilt early issues are actually Holstein-Gottorp pieces rather than Russian. I have only seen early gold and crystal pieces of Alexander Nevsky, so the large number of bronze/silver-gilt Anna pieces, and I am including pieces with long standing provenances including the ANS piece and several I handled in the 80's and 90's, are all privately made

      Paul

      Well, let`s see ;)

      As we know russian Kapitul was very strict (back in these days) about order returning policy (after the death of cavalier)

      Frankly I don`t think that they would care that much if their orders were made in bronze.

      But indeed some of our coleagues say that at least some (or even majority!) of the Kapitul Anna`s from the early days were made in bronze alloy.

      No hard proof (at least known to me) for both veiw points :whistle:

      Anyway, I bet you are already bored to death with all my mumbling, so let`s hit pictures :D

      Kapitul Anna in gold

    2. All the official ones should be in gold even the ones handed out in WWl.

      Damn right! ;)

      What baffles me are the unmarked gold ones.

      You are not alone :whistle:

      I think the silver-gilt examples are duplicates for the owner & the vast majority are post war copies for the collectors market.

      Yes these (and bronze ones) could be privately ordered copies for day-to-day wear (+ very often cavaliers sold their official "gold with diamonds" orders and were using these as replacement ;))

    3. I am willing to talk about this "mess" as long as necessary

      Actually you said "bye" a long time ago

      Have a great day!

      You constantly contradicts to your very self ;)

      ... to get you to accept some responsibility.

      What are you talking about?! :wacky:

      What responsiblility?

      For what?

      For providing new images of rare order (many of which you can`t "google") and awarding ceremony?

      Then yes, I accept full responsiblity for that!

    4. Perhaps I was mistaken about Nick's intent. But Nick could have prevented that by providing appropriate comments in the first place. In this case, a picture is not worth 1000 words.

      One one thing is for certain - your own intentions are quite clear and obvious!

      Now you trying to talk your way out of this mess.

      Not very impressive job! ;)

      You asked

      So, what exactly did the paratroopers do to earn such a prestigious award? (For those of us that don't read Russian so well)

      Ok.

      So naturally I think he can`t read Ukaz.

      Let`s help him out ;)

      "For the successful execution of command assignments and for displaying of courage and heroism" :whistle:

      No "thanks" and

      Well, Google translator could have told me that... I was hoping for a more insightful expert translation. :rolleyes:With perhaps considerably more detail beyond the official party line.

      And then you have a nerve to write :lol:

      Frankly, you should "trust" me that my question was simply interest in the award itself - just like in many other GMIC discussions, it's interesting to understand for what reasons an award is bestowed.

      Two moderators.

      One openly provocating a member to break the club rules.

      Another one is simply insulting him and demanding to "close him up permanently"

      Are they gentleman`s?

      Hardly!

    ×
    ×
    • Create New...

    Important Information

    We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.