MichaW Posted November 29, 2006 Author Posted November 29, 2006 Hello,what do you think about this cross?
spectre Posted November 30, 2006 Posted November 30, 2006 Hi Micha,Your cross looks good to me but Jacques is the real expert. Are there any marks?Alan
Riley1965 Posted November 30, 2006 Posted November 30, 2006 Everything seems to be in order. A nice specimen!! Doc
Jacques Posted November 30, 2006 Posted November 30, 2006 hi MichawIt seems that you had the idea than me... the cross looks convincing, nevertheless I'm not confortable with it. I think it is a very well done dangerous copy.It is mainly encountered with the CEJ 900 or 800 MM. The deail of the eagle head is typical.Here are few samples of the same copies.
Riley1965 Posted December 3, 2006 Posted December 3, 2006 Jacques,What is wrong with it that makes it a copy? The detail seems right. I am asking because I want to learn about them. Doc
Jacques Posted December 3, 2006 Posted December 3, 2006 I shown two different crosses which are IMO copies. There are MM CEJ 900 , but the CEJ mark is wrong, the eagles are not of the design as the original Juncker, thus the clutched swasticas. The cross presented at the top of the thread shows the same eagles details and swasticas, with no mark. Ithink it is a very dangerous fake. I will try to find other pictures of the same type of cross with other MM.
Riley1965 Posted December 3, 2006 Posted December 3, 2006 Jacques,I think I see copy's error with the eagle's claw grasping the swatika Doc
Jacques Posted December 3, 2006 Posted December 3, 2006 Jacques,I think I see copy's error with the eagle's claw grasping the swatika DocThe form of the swords grips is wrong too.
Jacques Posted December 3, 2006 Posted December 3, 2006 reverse of the gold cross previously presented (COPY)
Riley1965 Posted December 3, 2006 Posted December 3, 2006 Jacques,I keep looking at the sword grips and I am wondering what is wrong with them? Doc
Jacques Posted December 3, 2006 Posted December 3, 2006 Jacques,I keep looking at the sword grips and I am wondering what is wrong with them? DocLook on the reverse. On the copies, it seems there is a little round part at the top, which is not on the originals.The eagles swastica have 3 cut branches on the copies, only 2 on the originals.
Riley1965 Posted December 3, 2006 Posted December 3, 2006 Jacques,Thank You for the explanation!!! I learned something new today Doc
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now