ccj Posted November 5, 2007 Posted November 5, 2007 What's the difference between the two?Also, were feldmutzen supposed to have chinstraps? Were Schirmutzen supposed to be without straps?
Chip Posted November 7, 2007 Posted November 7, 2007 Charles,First, if you don't mind, it's Schirmm?tze and Feldm?tze. I think any cap that was a duty cap, as opposed to a dress cap, could be called a Feldm?tze. A Schirmm?tze is specifically a visored cap. A Feldm?tze could have a chinstrap as long as it was a visored cap. Both enlisted (M09) and officer's visored caps had chinstraps. In 1915 a new visored cap was introduced for enlisted men. It was to have no chinstrap and was intended to be for non-field use. So Schirmm?tzen could be with or without chinstraps. Technically, it depended on the model of the cap. In practice, visored caps were worn by non-Portepee NCOs and enlisted men in the field.I don't have time tonight to verify this tonight (it's almost 11:30pm), but I am pretty sure I have my facts straight.Chip
Thomas Posted November 13, 2007 Posted November 13, 2007 ccj, did you read the evolution page on the kaiser bunker web pages for imperial german hats? fantastic research and great if you cant afford those big dollar references..http://www.kaisersbunker.com/ht/index.htm
ccj Posted November 17, 2007 Author Posted November 17, 2007 ccj, did you read the evolution page on the kaiser bunker web pages for imperial german hats? fantastic research and great if you cant afford those big dollar references..http://www.kaisersbunker.com/ht/index.htmYeah, that's pretty good stuff...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now