perfectos Posted February 15, 2008 Posted February 15, 2008 Hello: My first post, having just joined the Club. During World War I, how much time usually elapsed after a British soldier was reported missing in action until his status was changed to killed in action? Thanks,perfectos
Tony Posted February 15, 2008 Posted February 15, 2008 Hello and welcome to the forum.An example I have is taken from the army record of a 1st July 1916 casualty.Active service casualty form - reported missing 8th July 1916Effects form stating he is deceased - 13th November 1917Belongings form - 28th November 1917I don't know how long it takes for the paperwork to be completed after confirmation of death is given, but it could be just days or weeks in between. If we assume this record is the norm, we're talking about 16 months missing before confirmation of death.Tony
Tom Morgan Posted February 15, 2008 Posted February 15, 2008 Welcome. Perfectos.I've seen the details of an officer who was reported Missing and about three months later, his solicitor wrote to the War Office to ask if the officer was still consiered missing, or if he was now considered to have been killed. The reply said that the the officer could not be listed as "presumed killed" because six months had to elapse first. At the end of six months the officer's family received notification that he was presumed to have been killed. This would seem to suggest that the "waiting period" was six months, but in many other cases I have heard of, it was more like a year.Incidentally, British soldiers were never listed as "Missing in Action" - it was just "Missing".And I believe that missing soldiers were not re-classified as "Killed in Action" - it was "Missing, Presumed Killed". In other words, the principal part of the classification was still "missing" because no one actually knew what had happened to the man.Tom
Graham Stewart Posted February 17, 2008 Posted February 17, 2008 Gents,This is an extract from Army Council Instructions dated 20th November 1915 regarding the "missing", which may be of interest to you all. I have also seen a what I believe was a Red Cross document which does make mention of the six months period, but can't remember where.Graham.
perfectos Posted February 17, 2008 Author Posted February 17, 2008 Thank you very much for the detailed information. perfectos
Tom Morgan Posted February 17, 2008 Posted February 17, 2008 I found this Instruction very interesting, Graham, and thanks to you for posting it.Army Form B104-82 (The form which the Instruction notes as the wrong one to use) is the form which notifies that a soldier has been killed. It has a space where the cause of death is to be written, and presumably they were writing "Missing, Believed Killed" there.The form the Instruction says should be used, Army Form B 104-83, informs the next-of-kin that a soldier is missing, with an explanation that this does not necessarily mean that he is dead.Tom
Fromelles Posted March 13, 2008 Posted March 13, 2008 Though this relates to the Australians it is probably run along the similar lines to the British.On the 12 August 1917, 13 months after the battle of Fromelles (19/20 July 1916) those still missing of the 32nd Battalion were reclassed as KIA.Initially they were classed "Missing after Action, France, 20 July 1916" till changed to "Killed in Action"On the 20 October 1916 (3 months to the day) the missing were "Struck off Strength" from the battalion.Dan
bigjarofwasps Posted May 11, 2008 Posted May 11, 2008 What an interesting thread. I assume that they`d ask around to see if anyone had seen him being killed or wounded. I also a ssume that there are cases where a guy was presumed dead, only to turn up as a POW at a later date?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now