Jump to content
News Ticker
  • I am now accepting the following payment methods: Card Payments, Apple Pay, Google Pay and PayPal
  • Latest News

    Can anyone identify the unit?


    Recommended Posts

    Hello Everyone,

    This weekend I picked up a number of items including this photo of a soldier and his family. Is it possible to identify his unit? It is a cabinet photo not a postcard which propaply explains the lack of any writing on the reverse of the photo.

    My scanner will not allow me to do anything except scan and print so I have to rely on photography so I hope the detail is sufficient for identification purposes.

    Any help is greatly appreciated.

    Cheers :cheers:

    Brian

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Brian,

    Well, he is an NCO from the Garde Korps. I think the squared off front visor on his helmet with narrow it down a bit more. Perhaps the 1.Garde Dragoner Regiment. The dark Litzen on the collar indicates that they were most likely yellow, as opposed to white for the 2.Garde Dragoner Rgt.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Many thanks for the information Chip.

    Not so fast, he looks to me to be Prussian Landgendarmerie. The "Foot" or Fu?gendarmen had the round peak and the "mounted" or Berittene Gendarmen the square peak like a dragoon helmet. The Preu?en Landgendarmerie (Rural Police) wore Polish cuffs with a single Garde Litzen, and in 1889 Swedish cuffs with double Garde Litzen were adopted for the Landgendarmerie. According to Ingo L?hken Die Polizei-Uniformen in Preu?en 1866 1945 (p.19) the Garde star was adopted in 1895.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Not so fast, he looks to me to be Prussian Landgendarmerie. The "Foot" or Fu?gendarmen had the round peak and the "mounted" or Berittene Gendarmen the square peak like a dragoon helmet. The Preu?en Landgendarmerie (Rural Police) wore Polish cuffs with a single Garde Litzen, and in 1889 Swedish cuffs with double Garde Litzen were adopted for the Landgendarmerie. According to Ingo L?hken Die Polizei-Uniformen in Preu?en 1866 1945 (p.19) the Garde star was adopted in 1895.

    Hi Thomas,

    Just to get this clear in my mind. Are you saying this fellow is a Prussian Landgendarmerie and would have been mounted? I assume that the Garde star is the star on his helmet so the photo would have to be after 1895. I'm a novice to uniform identification but I can't resist purchasing these older photographs for my collection.

    Thanks for you assistance.

    Cheers :cheers:

    Brian

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I'm no expert, but he may be onto something. If he was a Garde Dragoon he'd have double litzen on his collar and I would think it would come up high enough that you'd see them, and you can't see any litzen on the little bit of collar that's peeking out of his greatcoat. The Preu?en Landgendarmerie did wear the Garde star on their helmets, so he could be one of them because a single litzen wouldn't show in the photo because it's down more towards the middle of the collar and is hidden by the greatcoat collar, plus he only has a single litzen on his greatcoat too.

    Edited by Mike Dwyer
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Thomas: You may be on to something here, but the single Garde Litze would mean this photo is pre-1889? Too bad we can't see the shoulder boards.

    Mike: If I am not mistaken, in the case of a regiment with double Litzen, when worn with NCO collar lace, the Litzen were normally reduced from two to one. I don't think this held true for the Kragenpatten on overcoats, so whatever unit this is, it used only one Litze.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Mike: If I am not mistaken, in the case of a regiment with double Litzen, when worn with NCO collar lace, the Litzen were normally reduced from two to one. I don't think this held true for the Kragenpatten on overcoats, so whatever unit this is, it used only one Litze.

    Chip,

    You know a lot more about this than I do, so I don't make any claim to being necessarily correct. I agree with you about the one Litzen with NCO collar lace. On the uniform collar peeking out of the greatcoat, I don't see any NCO lace at all, but perhaps I'm missing it, it just looks like plain collar fabric to me.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Thomas: You may be on to something here, but the single Garde Litze would mean this photo is pre-1889? Too bad we can't see the shoulder boards.

    Mike: If I am not mistaken, in the case of a regiment with double Litzen, when worn with NCO collar lace, the Litzen were normally reduced from two to one. I don't think this held true for the Kragenpatten on overcoats, so whatever unit this is, it used only one Litze.

    I have to admit that I noticed the single litzen on the collar of the coat, and remembered that I had read about the Prussian mounted Landgendarmerie on the pickelhaubes forum here where it was discussed that they wore the square peak like a dragoon helmet but only wore single collar litzen. According to that thread, the LG wore a single litzen on the collar never a double. So the collar would only show a single litzen. The double litzen was only worn on the swedish cuffs after 1889 when they changed from polish cuffs with single litzen. Cuffs can't be seen, but this had to be sometime after 1895 when the LG adopted the guard star.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Mike,

    I am not sure if the ranks in the LG mirrored those of the army, but the NCO Borte on the overcoat Kragenpatten could represent any of the ranks of Unteroffizier, Sergeant, F?hnrich, Vizefeldwebel or Offizierstellvertreter. All of these ranks work Tresse on the tunic collar.

    Chip

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Mike,

    I am not sure if the ranks in the LG mirrored those of the army, but the NCO Borte on the overcoat Kragenpatten could represent any of the ranks of Unteroffizier, Sergeant, F?hnrich, Vizefeldwebel or Offizierstellvertreter. All of these ranks work Tresse on the tunic collar.

    Chip

    Chip,

    Yes, I saw that. Perhaps I misunderstood your earlier post, I thought you were implying that we might not be able to see the Litzen on his tunic collar because of his NCO lace and I was saying I didn't see any NCO lace which would lead me to believe more that there's only a single Litzen hiding behind that overcoat collar; because if there was double Litzen and no NCO lace you'd see the top part of the Litzen on his collar. As an NCO if he was in a double Litzen unit wouldn't there still be double Litzen on his overcoat Kragenpatten? I honestly don't know, just asking. :speechless:

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Mike,

    The double Litzen on overcoat Kragenpatten was not affected by the additon of NCO Borte, even if it was the two strips of Borte that a Feldwebel wore. Here is an example of a double Litzen overcoat tab with two strips of NCO Borte (Hessian Leib Garde Inf.Rgt.Nr.115).

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Mike,

    The double Litzen on overcoat Kragenpatten was not affected by the additon of NCO Borte, even if it was the two strips of Borte that a Feldwebel wore. Here is an example of a double Litzen overcoat tab with two strips of NCO Borte (Hessian Leib Garde Inf.Rgt.Nr.115).

    Chip,

    Thanks for the example. So am I correct in assuming if this fellow only has one litzen on his overcoat Kragenpatten then there's only one on his tunic collar too?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now
    ×
    ×
    • Create New...

    Important Information

    We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.