Mervyn Mitton Posted November 1, 2009 Posted November 1, 2009 (edited) This is an unusual item , for a number of reasons. The Crown and top half of the shaft are almost certainly Georgian - that is pre-1830. The shape and style of the crown indicate this. However, the shaft - with it's very Indian appearance, was probably inserted during the time of the Hon. East India Company - or, pre 1860. Perhaps the original carved wooden handle was damaged - or, if the tipstaff was for an Indian official to carry, then it may have been changed to give him local authority. There is a long history of Indian officials - such as treasury guard commanders, bodyguard N.C.O.'s etc. - however, whilst you hear of them, they are not often seen. Edited November 1, 2009 by Mervyn Mitton
peter monahan Posted November 1, 2009 Posted November 1, 2009 What a lovely piece! Thanks for sharing. Peter
Brian Wolfe Posted November 1, 2009 Posted November 1, 2009 Amazing artifact. British and Indian what more could anyone want. Many thanks for sharing this treasure with us. Regards Brian
Hugh Posted November 1, 2009 Posted November 1, 2009 This is an unusual item , for a number of reasons. The Crown and top half of the shaft are almost certainly Georgian - that is pre-1830. The shape and style of the crown indicate this. However, the shaft - with it's very Indian appearance, was probably inserted during the time of the Hon. East India Company - or, pre 1860. Perhaps the original carved wooden handle was damaged - or, if the tipstaff was for an Indian official to carry, then it may have been changed to give him local authority. There is a long history of Indian officials - such as treasury guard commanders, bodyguard N.C.O.'s etc. - however, whilst you hear of them, they are not often seen. Hi, Mervyn, What's the red material lining the crown? Thanks, Hugh
Mervyn Mitton Posted November 2, 2009 Author Posted November 2, 2009 The lining to the Crown is usually red velvet - however, I have seen them in purple. The reason for the lining is heraldic - it represents the Cap of Maintenance - worn only by the Sovereign. Back in the 11th and 12 th Centuries it probably had the original purpose of protecting the head from the harshness of a metal helmet. For the King , it came to represent his authority and also,responsibilities to his People. It would be worn at most times when the Crown was not being worn - but, if the Crown was in place the Cap was underneath. Eventually, it was incorporated in the Body of the Crown. An important part of the Royal regalia.
Hugh Posted November 2, 2009 Posted November 2, 2009 The lining to the Crown is usually red velvet - however, I have seen them in purple. The reason for the lining is heraldic - it represents the Cap of Maintenance - worn only by the Sovereign. Back in the 11th and 12 th Centuries it probably had the original purpose of protecting the head from the harshness of a metal helmet. For the King , it came to represent his authority and also,responsibilities to his People. It would be worn at most times when the Crown was not being worn - but, if the Crown was in place the Cap was underneath. Eventually, it was incorporated in the Body of the Crown. An important part of the Royal regalia. Thanks for that, Mervyn. I have a vague recollection of some of that, but your reminder is helpful.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now