Alex Bolotnikov Posted January 20, 2010 Posted January 20, 2010 Just wonder if all the Junkcer KCs with 800 L/12 mark and Lazy 2 have the same die flaw:
Alex Bolotnikov Posted January 21, 2010 Author Posted January 21, 2010 So why just one picture? Hi Darrell, Can post as much pictures as needed It's the right arm of the cross.
Guest Darrell Posted January 21, 2010 Posted January 21, 2010 Hi Darrell, Can post as much pictures as needed It's the right arm of the cross. Post closeups of the front and reverse please.
censlenov Posted January 21, 2010 Posted January 21, 2010 To me it looks like there are 2 more die flaws one between the 00 in 800 (runs vertically) and the other between the /1 (also running vertically). What do you think? Cheers Chris
Guest Darrell Posted January 21, 2010 Posted January 21, 2010 Nice Pictures !!! I see a similar flaw on a Juncker in Dietrich's book p.62. Although it's not in the same light as yours, you can see a couple close together like yours. I can't say whether this is on "all" Junckers, Dietrich doesn't show many pictures of that exact spot.
Alex Bolotnikov Posted January 22, 2010 Author Posted January 22, 2010 To me it looks like there are 2 more die flaws one between the 00 in 800 (runs vertically) and the other between the /1 (also running vertically). What do you think? Cheers Chris Chris, That should be my next question I was searching thru GMIC and WAF archives but couldn't find some firm proof. Some of the crosses have these flaws some not. But maybe it's because of the low quality photos. Once again I'm talking only about 800-L/12 and Lazy 2 crosses.
Alex Bolotnikov Posted January 22, 2010 Author Posted January 22, 2010 Nice Pictures !!! I see a similar flaw on a Juncker in Dietrich's book p.62. Although it's not in the same light as yours, you can see a couple close together like yours. I can't say whether this is on "all" Junckers, Dietrich doesn't show many pictures of that exact spot. Nice camera Yes I also found this flaw in the book but just want to get additional confirmation from the KC owners :)
Alex Bolotnikov Posted January 24, 2010 Author Posted January 24, 2010 So many views and only few replies :(
Guest Darrell Posted January 24, 2010 Posted January 24, 2010 So many views and only few replies Alex are you concerned about the flaw or just curious? It's a texbook RK no worries there.
Alex Bolotnikov Posted January 24, 2010 Author Posted January 24, 2010 Alex are you concerned about the flaw or just curious? It's a texbook RK no worries there. Darrell, I have no doubts about originality of the cross itself, just was curious about the die flaw
kraut72 Posted April 15, 2010 Posted April 15, 2010 This parallel mistake on the 12 hourly arms all Juncker KC observable!the early neusilbernél yet only an little dot,but the dies the small argument of his usage grew up to an end continuously with his progress all Juncker series and Lazy 2 showing a beautiful parallel line already.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now