Brian Wolfe Posted February 24, 2010 Author Posted February 24, 2010 hi brian, it only a quick one to say that pc c fairbrass joined the met in 1877 paul Hi Paul, Thank you for this new information. It is a welcomed addition to my data bank on PC. C. Fairbrass. Regards Brian
Guest pikemedals Posted February 26, 2010 Posted February 26, 2010 Hi Paul, Thank you for this new information. It is a welcomed addition to my data bank on PC. C. Fairbrass. Regards Brian hi brian can't make it to the n/a today as my laptop being pick up. so i got to stay in. but will go next week and look up ps fairbrass for you
Brian Wolfe Posted February 26, 2010 Author Posted February 26, 2010 hi brian can't make it to the n/a today as my laptop being pick up. so i got to stay in. but will go next week and look up ps fairbrass for you No prpoblem. I really appreciate your efforts and look forward top the information. Regards Brian
Guest pikemedals Posted March 3, 2010 Posted March 3, 2010 hi brian. went to the national archives on Tuesday and found this on ps fairbrass. PS 11-62076 FAIRRASS ABSENT FROM DUTY AND DIVISION WITHOUT LEAVE AND NOT YET RETURNED AND CONSIDERED UNFIT FOR THE POLICE.so that why he was dismissed this was in mepo 7/57 dated 17/06/1895 paul
Brian Wolfe Posted March 3, 2010 Author Posted March 3, 2010 hi brian. went to the national archives on Tuesday and found this on ps fairbrass. PS 11-62076 FAIRRASS ABSENT FROM DUTY AND DIVISION WITHOUT LEAVE AND NOT YET RETURNED AND CONSIDERED UNFIT FOR THE POLICE.so that why he was dismissed this was in mepo 7/57 dated 17/06/1895 paul Thank you very much for all of your work Paul. I have one question, should the "ps" before fairbrass and before 11-62076 be "PC"? This is so much more information than I could ever have believed possible. Thank you again. Regards Brian
Guest pikemedals Posted March 3, 2010 Posted March 3, 2010 in the police orders.it has the rank,collar number,and the warrant number.so he was a police sergeant when he was dismissed.collar number was 11 and the last was his warrant number paul
Brian Wolfe Posted March 4, 2010 Author Posted March 4, 2010 (edited) in the police orders.it has the rank,collar number,and the warrant number.so he was a police sergeant when he was dismissed.collar number was 11 and the last was his warrant number paul Thanks once again Paul. I actually was wondering if the ps stood for police sergeant but then I thought that would have been too good to be true, as it often is in collecting. Now I am very happy! Regards Brian Edited March 4, 2010 by Brian Wolfe
Michael Johnson Posted March 4, 2010 Posted March 4, 2010 I wondered why in the Old Bailey reports the policemen's numbers seemed so low. They are giving the division letter and collar number. Might help with some of the more common names.
Odin Mk 3 Posted March 5, 2010 Posted March 5, 2010 Adding to the information already given: Cornelius Fairbrass joined the force 31/12/1977 with the Warrant Number 62076. He left 17/06/1895 (dismissed) and was then a PS serving in G Division (Finsbury) with the number 11G. This information comes from the discharge register and part of the old police orders database. I'm sorry there are holes in my book as mentioned above but this is because I was struggling to get a complete picture for many of the men who joined before around 1879. So if there were too many blanks in a man's entry I had little choice but to omit them as the entry was of limited value. I do have various bits of information that may help pick up those not included in the book so please feel free to ask if you can't find someone.
Brian Wolfe Posted March 5, 2010 Author Posted March 5, 2010 Adding to the information already given: Cornelius Fairbrass joined the force 31/12/1977 with the Warrant Number 62076. He left 17/06/1895 (dismissed) and was then a PS serving in G Division (Finsbury) with the number 11G. This information comes from the discharge register and part of the old police orders database. I'm sorry there are holes in my book as mentioned above but this is because I was struggling to get a complete picture for many of the men who joined before around 1879. So if there were too many blanks in a man's entry I had little choice but to omit them as the entry was of limited value. I do have various bits of information that may help pick up those not included in the book so please feel free to ask if you can't find someone. All I can say, besides thank you for the information, is that your fellows are amazing! What started out as a purchase through error has become one of my treasured artifacts of my collection. Thanks again. Regards Brian
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now