Mackinturk Posted March 19, 2010 Posted March 19, 2010 Hi all, We just got some new helmets in and I need some help identifying a couple of markings inside one of them. The helmet is a tropical helmet with a long flap in front and back to cover the neck and shoulders and a glass face shield. It was listed as a "Royal Engineers Special Pattern Tropical Special Companies Foreign Service Helmet." I believe it may be an early type of gas helmet. Inside the flaps though there are three ink stamps. One is "W.D. 1915" with a an arrow or crow's foot type of symbol; I think this is the War Department acceptance stamp. The others I can't figure out though; one is "17 G.H." and the other is "45 C.C.S." I don't know if these are unit markings or what. I'll try to take some pictures today to post up here. Any help with the markings or any info on the helmet would be greatly appreciated. Thanks
leigh kitchen Posted March 19, 2010 Posted March 19, 2010 If it was'nt for the "W.D. 1915" marking, I would've suggested a WWII period anti - gas cover used on British steel helmets, "17 G.H." possbly 17th Battalion Gordon HIghlanders, "45 C.C.S. possibly 45th Casualty Clearing Station, that's about the best I can come up with. It does appear that photos are required - a sun helmet, a steel helmet or a hood?
Stuart Bates Posted March 19, 2010 Posted March 19, 2010 Unless I am mistaken I have seen photos of this one. It is a Wolseley modified by the removal of the ventilator and the consequent stopping up of the vent. Presumably to prevent gas from entering the helmet shell. It has a fitted hood all around into which is let a glass arrangement not dissimilar to a scuba face mask. There is also a fixture which takes a tube to supply air into the helmet but from where? A tank containing Oxylithe (sodium peroxide or sodium dioxide which absorbs carbon dioxide and emits oxygen) may have been used. If it is indeed Royal Engineers then a tube attached to a compressor may have been used for such things a mine rescue i.e. a collapsed or destroyed sap. It is obviously an attempt to provide protection from gas but, obviously, not too many were made. Unless someone on the forum can ID this I suggest enquiries to the NAM or the Royal Engineers Museum. Stuart
Mackinturk Posted March 22, 2010 Author Posted March 22, 2010 That's pretty much what it is, though it's not quite a Wolseley pattern. I'll put some photos below. Thanks for the suggestion about the Royal Engineers museum, I will also be trying to contact them.
Mackinturk Posted March 22, 2010 Author Posted March 22, 2010 side view. as you can see, the brim is much smaller that usual tropical helmets.
Mackinturk Posted March 22, 2010 Author Posted March 22, 2010 this is what the tube attachment on the front brim connects to inside the helmet. notice the line of small holes. obviously this is some sort of air inlet, though for what purpose is unknown.
Stuart Bates Posted March 22, 2010 Posted March 22, 2010 You are right about the brim. The leather edging seems "huge", is it indicative of the thickness of helmet's shell? And is it made of cork? Did it have a top ventilator cap which was subsequently removed and the vent stopped up? Stuart
Stuart Bates Posted March 22, 2010 Posted March 22, 2010 I presume that it has a leather headband, if so, is there anything stamped on it? And is there any ventilation between it and the shell? Stuart
Mackinturk Posted March 24, 2010 Author Posted March 24, 2010 the leather edge does show how thick the shell is, and it does appear to be made of cork. aside from the glass plate and housing on the front, the helmet is pretty lightweight. here's the top. there is no evidence of a vent hole.
Mackinturk Posted March 24, 2010 Author Posted March 24, 2010 (edited) the inside. it has a leather sweatband with a padded suspension system. i haven't seen anything like it in a pith helmet. i'm guessing it needed more suspension because of the increased weight. the face shield makes it very unbalanced, with most of the weight in the front. and there are no markings inside the helmet, just the ink stamps that i mentioned in the first post. Edited March 24, 2010 by Mackinturk
Stuart Bates Posted March 24, 2010 Posted March 24, 2010 There does seem to have been some modification to the top of the crown. Can I see a few extra stitches? And notice how the seam from 2 o'clock to 8 o'clock does not form a straight line as do the others. Stuart
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now