stukapilot Posted August 9, 2010 Posted August 9, 2010 Hi everyone! What do you think about this KC? Early Deschler?
Wood Posted August 9, 2010 Posted August 9, 2010 I'm not an expert, but I think it may be a copy. Pete
Gordon Williamson Posted August 9, 2010 Posted August 9, 2010 It has the correct "textbook" flaw on the swastika that you would expect on a genuine Deschler piece. Detail looks a bit soft but could just be well worn. Size and weight would be useful to confirm.
Wood Posted August 9, 2010 Posted August 9, 2010 Gordon, I have not heard about the swastika flaw, I was just going by the three and the right arm (as looking at it) What period is this strike? Pete
Gordon Williamson Posted August 10, 2010 Posted August 10, 2010 Original Deschler pieces usually have a small "spike" showing in the corner of the arm at 12 o'clock. Seems to be present on the one in this thread also.
stukapilot Posted August 10, 2010 Author Posted August 10, 2010 It has the correct "textbook" flaw on the swastika that you would expect on a genuine Deschler piece. Detail looks a bit soft but could just be well worn. Size and weight would be useful to confirm. Gordon, thank you for your opinion! The size is 59.9x53 mm, the weight is 33 g.
Gordon Williamson Posted August 10, 2010 Posted August 10, 2010 The size is just right, and originals are known from 33-36gr in weight. So with correct weight and correct dimensions, plus the expected flaws, it suggests this is a good one.
stukapilot Posted August 10, 2010 Author Posted August 10, 2010 So can we call it "early Deschler micro 900"?
Gordon Williamson Posted August 11, 2010 Posted August 11, 2010 Yes, I'd say it looks like an early one. I have seen a small number of early Deschler pieces which don't have the "1" maker mark.
stukapilot Posted August 11, 2010 Author Posted August 11, 2010 Yes, I'd say it looks like an early one. I have seen a small number of early Deschler pieces which don't have the "1" maker mark. Nice to hear that! Gordon, thank you very much.
Paul R Posted August 15, 2010 Posted August 15, 2010 Those are my favorite medals. I really like it a lot. I am jealous.
all1knew Posted September 2, 2010 Posted September 2, 2010 Hello there, I would like to voice my opinion. There is absolutely NOTHING wrong with this cross, ZERO. It is an awarded decoration that has developed great patina that could never be faked. William Kramer
stukapilot Posted September 2, 2010 Author Posted September 2, 2010 Hello there, I would like to voice my opinion. There is absolutely NOTHING wrong with this cross, ZERO. It is an awarded decoration that has developed great patina that could never be faked. William Kramer William, thank you for your opinion!
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now