EK 1939 EK II unmarked, with some peculiarities...

[leonard]

Hello everyone!

I have an iron cross which presents some peculiarities I would love to hear your opinions on

The first is that the jump ring is soldered to one side, but detached from the other:

The second peculiarity is the unfinish look for most of the lower part of the beading near the core; in other parts it is even more severe.

Lastly, the total absence of deposits, not only corrosion or oxydation, but even of dirt of dust underneath the frame, really astonishing for a decoration, maybe unused, but several decades old

The cross is unmarked

Cheers!

Leonard

[leonard]

Hello again Gents.

I would like to post another view of the approximative beading. Is that something you already encountered?

Also visible the suspension ring detached from frame

P.S.

I am posting photos as attachments (something I will do from now on) as I realise the previous ones would not last long as hosted by a third party site.

Thank you,

L.

Edited June 28, 2014 by leonard

[leonard]

90 views and not a comment or opinion?

[dond]

I don't collect TR crosses but you see the same stuff on Imperial crosses.

[piekenier]

Looks all fine to me