Megan Posted March 19, 2015 Posted March 19, 2015 Replacing the blue shirt and darker blue trousers of Action Working Dress (No.4s) is a very dark blue rig.See: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-31950420
Mervyn Mitton Posted March 19, 2015 Posted March 19, 2015 I suppose this is the way of things today - probably more wearable then previously. However, in my opinion, they are now on a dress level with sewerage workers. 200 years of tradition - the collar, the white inner shirt, the white trousers - all gone. Does no-one ever care about the past history that made our armed forces ? Mervyn
paul wood Posted March 19, 2015 Posted March 19, 2015 Probably no one will recognise them as sailors. I hope that at least they keep the traditional uniforms for parades and displays.Paul
SimonLMoore Posted March 21, 2015 Posted March 21, 2015 Nice to see myths being perpetuated by the BCC, the 7 trouser creases do not represent the 7 seas. Indeed if you were under a certain height (5' 6" I think) you only had 5.Edit; wow, seems that graphic is put out by the RN itself. They don't seem to know their own history. The 3 stripes are also nothing to do with Nelson's victories, some original collars had only 2 and it was decided with the introduction of a uniform for all sailors in 1857 that 3 looked better, smarter, etc. It's not naval folklore, it's landlubber's folklore that's grown up around the uniform well after the fact.
jf42 Posted March 25, 2015 Posted March 25, 2015 Can one have an epaulette in the middle of one's chest?
Dave Alexander Posted April 26, 2015 Posted April 26, 2015 This is just working dress, or No 4. The RN has dresses 1 thru 5 and the No 1 even has 3 classes. 1A, 1B and 1C. All the traditional stuff has been kept.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now