BURGERHAUS Posted May 7, 2006 Posted May 7, 2006 [attachmentid=38178][attachmentid=38179]Gents I assume this is a replacement issue as eveidenced by the B instead of a serial number. I am hoping some other members would have one of these examples to post for comparison. Thank you for your time and courtesy and have a nice Sunday. Robert
Scowen Posted May 7, 2006 Posted May 7, 2006 Nice looking badge Robert. Unfortunately though I do not have any experiance of these so can not offer any opinion as to authenticity.Hopefully someone else can help.CheersDon
benten Posted May 7, 2006 Posted May 7, 2006 Hello Robert ,Sometimes we meet again. Here 's mine for comparison. Cheers, Benten [attachmentid=38235]
benten Posted May 7, 2006 Posted May 7, 2006 backside.........difficult to see, because the damage, but it is definitely M1/120.[attachmentid=38241]
benten Posted May 7, 2006 Posted May 7, 2006 Here a second one of the back of another angle.[attachmentid=38244]
BURGERHAUS Posted May 7, 2006 Author Posted May 7, 2006 Benten, Thanks for showing your example. Mine seems to lack the little alignment o and the RZM stamp on mine isn't as crisp and detailed as yours. I got this impulsively from a well-known dealer with all of 4 minutes of analysis time. I did do something I have never done before and that is get a COA with it. So, if It appears in any way un-authentic, feel free to say so. Allopinions are welcome. One question slightly off-topic. When returning an item is a refund given for the COA as well. I would think so. HA Ha! Robert
DanCz Posted May 8, 2006 Posted May 8, 2006 It looks fine to me Robert - - a replacement or "second" pin with a more secure pin fitting assembley.
fknorr Posted May 8, 2006 Posted May 8, 2006 I do not have them in front of me but I believe the Roger Bender/Angolia 2-Volume set on the HJ covers the markings on the reverse of these pretty well. I was looking at that very section a month or so ago but I cannot remember what they were exactly...worth a look.
BURGERHAUS Posted May 8, 2006 Author Posted May 8, 2006 Gents, Thanks for your replies. I was not too comfortable about getting it on a Friday morning with 4 minutes of research. This explains my getting a COA with it. I mean, in all seriousness, how the devil could anyone make well thought-out purchase in that short a period of time? I will take some better images tommorow (Tuesday) on my day off. Thanks again Robert
BURGERHAUS Posted May 9, 2006 Author Posted May 9, 2006 Here is an image with the attaching pin open. It looks good to me. There is evidence of honest wear front and back. More examples to view would be greatly appreciated. Unfortunately, I do not have any of Angolia's reference books. Stop buying badges and start buying more reference material. Thanks agin Gents. Robert
benten Posted May 9, 2006 Posted May 9, 2006 Here is an image with the attaching pin open. It looks good to me. There is evidence of honest wear front and back. More examples to view would be greatly appreciated. Unfortunately, I do not have any of Angolia's reference books. Stop buying badges and start buying more reference material. Thanks agin Gents. RobertRobert , imo this badge is Ok . On the rear the material, the copper-plate, is made of a bit crude substance, which is sometimes to see on original badges.........I think that's why the letters and numbers have this appearance, where you had your doubts about.The solderwork and pinsystem are in all details the same as my badge.Cheers,Benten
BURGERHAUS Posted October 13, 2006 Author Posted October 13, 2006 [attachmentid=57041][attachmentid=57042]Gents Long time no speak. Here is another recent addition to my HJ collection. M1/70 9253. I don't know about you but I am now more confused about these than ever before. I happened to check a dealer's site today and noticed the upgraded replacement attachment pin on an RZM marked badge. Also, there was a badge with document to a woman? Maybe my eyes deceived me. What do you guys make of all this? have a nice weekend. Robert
Scowen Posted October 14, 2006 Posted October 14, 2006 There isn't any problem with a female being awarded one. It was given to all members of the HJ & BDM who had joined prior to October 2nd 1932, & who had not less than 5 years unbroken service with either of the youth services or if they had outgrown these, one of the other NS organisations.CheersDon
BURGERHAUS Posted October 14, 2006 Author Posted October 14, 2006 Don I wasn't aware of that. Logically, I wouldn't have thought that would be the case in as much as Tr tended to separate the genders. Any thoughts on the RZM marked badge with the B replacement style attaching pin? Best Regards Robert
XEN Posted December 13, 2006 Posted December 13, 2006 (edited) I remember reading the account of an HJ member where he mentioned a regulation that came out in 1936 concerning improvement of the pin security due to the amount of Ehrenzeichen that were being lost. I've always regarded this as the reason for catches as displayed in post #1. Edited December 13, 2006 by XEN
XEN Posted December 13, 2006 Posted December 13, 2006 Ah, there is a post on here actually where the author states the regulation date as 1939 which makes more sense.
signalman Posted January 9, 2007 Posted January 9, 2007 Hello, is there a difference in value between the B replacement pin version, and the original pin??
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now