jf42

Silver Membership
  • Content count

    190
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

About jf42

  • Rank
    Regular Member

Profile Information

  • Location
    London
  1. The 10th Prince of Wales's Own Hussars badge featured the PoW's emblem of the three feathers over the motto "ich dien' and the regimental title, while the 11th Prince Albert's On Hussars badge featured the crest of the Prince Consort, "a pillar charged with the arms of Saxony rising out of the ducal coronet and also crowned with a similar coronet out of which rise 5 peacock feathers with the motto TREU UND FEST meaning 'Faithful and Strong'." I would say the collar badge in the OP photograph clearly shows the latter.
  2. Indeed, the Fosten images were clearly based on the Morier paintings; a remarkable resource, (although incidentally, I believe the date of the set is more usually estimated between 1749 and 1751, which may be based more on official papers relating to the uniforms illustrated than any more forensic detail relating to the artist or the paintings themselves). Your point about the Morier grenadiers being painted from life is an interesting one, given that the regiments of the British army were dispersed around the kingdom, colonies and other foreign possessions ( the same observation applies to the less ambitious Dayes set comissioned by Howgill for the Duke of York in the early 1790s). The likelihood of an individual from each regiment, fully dressed and accoutred, or even said clothing and accoutrements on their own, being sent to Morier's studio for him to paint, is not great. There may have been some sealed items stored in London, although at this point in history, so many elements being at the discretion of the Colonels rather than presscribed by central authority, I doubt that much data for Morier's set could have come from that source. I believe by the mid-C18th regimental lace was being logged centrally to ensure consistency and to avoid duplication but, apart from that resource, Morier may therefore have had to work up his figures mostly from written information. As for those fronds/vines, we can only guess. They are clearly there to fill space according to the shape of the individual badges or monograms, although the distinctive examples shown for the 17th and 32nd are both fitting round the standard "GR" rather than the individual badges of the 'Old Corps.' As the illustrations show, even the 'GR" emblem presented considerable variation. Given the cottage industry element in uniform manufacture at this time, quality control and consistency of execution was not as likely as the word 'uniform' might suggest. Thank you for drawing my attention to this.
  3. Thanks Flash heart for posting this reference material. This question is slighty off topic but I notice that the Fosten article nor any other commentary refers to the decorative fronds flanking the badges on the front of the grenadier caps illustrated. These vary considerably in form and seem in the case of some regiments to represent something more specific, in the colour of leaves, buds or fruit as it may be. e.g. the 6th, 17th and 32nd Regiment examples. Anyone care to hazard a guess as how we might describe these decorative elements?
  4. Can't argue with the numbers. Looks like it's WO 12 for you, my lad.
  5. That would seem to be a valid working hypothesis; perhaps the most convincing element being the claim made in the land grant application- (athough technically, simply by enlisting in August 1783, one might argue he served two months before the war was officially ended, but that is not an area I have knowledge of). It seems to be quite common that, for operational reasons, Muster Rolls might be completed some time after the end date for the period they covered. It's not impossible that the relevant facts were lost, although presumably the bulk of the men (allowing for the odd death or desertion) would have been present in Nova Scotia to provide the relevant information anew when records were being adjusted. I take it that the Muster Roll does not state where the new men were enlisted. Clearly, if it did then there would be no question. This detail could also have been supplied by the men. The recording of the new enlistments on the same day as the discharge of the group being sent back to Britain is interesting; one might even think conveniently neat, except that the army were unlikely to deal in approximate dates, since it would mean paying a man more, or less, than the amount he was due. Perhaps, these men were all enlisted 'in country' at the same place on the same day, from regiments that were shipping home. Another possibility is that these were American individuals from the Loyalist community, who were enlisting for want of other means to survive in their imminent exile. Is there a possibility that your ancestor was a colonial; perhaps even a soldier in one of the Provincial or Loyalist units? All that said, in case I didn't express myself clearly, I think it is worth restating that, while the 57th Regiment were undoubtedly in New York in the summer of 1783, recruiting parties of the regiment, meanwhile, would have been operating back in Britain, as they would have been throughout the war. One thing we can be sure of is that the party shipped back to Britain in August 1783 were not discharged simply because they had become surplus to requirement. Losing ten out of sixteen trained drummers at one time would have been inconvenient. After seven years of campaigning, ill health and general exhaustion may have resulted in the older, or less robust men being weeded out. With the regiment only numbering 352 in November 1781 and 77 men being sent home in August 1783, the 57th with a peace establishment of about 450 enlisted men would certainly have been in need of men, whether they found them locally or 'at home.' Anyway, good luck. Let us know how you get on.
  6. However, as a rough guide, the latest Order of Battle provided in the Nafziger collection : usacac.army.mil/CAC2/CGSC/CARL/nafziger/781KAD.pdf - shows that the garrison of New York in November 1781 included these regiments of the line, or elements thereof, cantoned either in or around the city. 40th 22nd 37th 38th 54th 42nd 57th The regiments that surrendered with Cornwallis at Yorktown the previous month included: 17th 23rd 33rd 43rd 2/71st 76th 80th 82nd L Coy + 2 LIght Infantry Battalions Nafziger cites this reference book 'Encyclopedia of British Provincial and German Army units 1775-1783' (Katcher) If you can lay your hands on it, you may find more details, but it may also only cite information up to November 1781.
  7. What is your theory based on, regarding your man's transfer from another regiment? In my experience, muster rolls usually enter the regiment from which a soldier has transferred or been drafted if he was already a serving soldier. The army like to keep track of soldiers. Although in 1783 the regiments were being reduced to a peacetime establishment, most in America had been reduced to a fraction of their official strength and would have needed recruits to make up numbers. Back in Britain and Ireland recruiting parties were busy in the spring and summer of 1783, (whether or not they were active in the newly assigned recruiting areas.) The 57th Light Coy had been captured at Yorktown, and may still have been interned. Do the Muster Rolls indicate he was actually in America when he enlisted in the 57th, or is it possible he enlisted back in Britain on the date recorded and was sent out to Nova Scotia to join the Regiment?
  8. Black Watch - you should be able to find numerous images of the 2nd Bn Black Watch wearing bush hats/slouch hats in the field when involved in the Chindit expeditions into Burma.
  9. These can only be subjective impressions via a photograph but I don't share the view that this cap lacks the appearance of any great age, nor that it looks as if it's been brought back in a time machine. The hair is matted and discoloured in a way that, to me, suggests the passage of centuries. I can't comment on the front plate but Flashheart's observations seem to me thorough and persuasive pending closer examination. Peter's comment about extended daily wear by a re -enactor or similar is an interesting one, but I have two observations to make. The first is that the great majority of re-enactors' bearskin caps don't get the look right, especially the 'skinny' profile of the upward grain of the fur. Instead, the nap is too bushy and they tend to resemble bad copies of French Imperial Guards caps. Or bad copies period (Obviously Peter is talking about an exception to that tendency). Secondly, who would wear such an immaculate and clearly expensive copy as this one in the field? As was the practice at the time, the caps were found to be too fragile for field use and were soon returned in store for special occasions in camp or cantonment. True the grenadiers at Brandywine still had their caps with them, ready to put on before they advanced.. I did see on a forum dedicated to the AWI, a claim by a re-enactor that his cap was so light and pliable, that he would keep it stuffed in the side pocket of his uniform coat, ready to whip out and clap on his head. I expressed some scepticism but he was insistent. Drummers might have been more likely to keep their caps although their role as signallers in the field was eventually relegated to a more ceremonial one, sounding calls in camp. The 50th, reduced by service in the West Indies and sent home in 1776, passed the rest of the Americanwar reforming and on garrison duty in England and Ireland before being posted to Gibraltar in 1784. It passed the next fifteen years serving in various mediterranean stations culminating in the Egypt campaign of 1801 after which it returned home. At that time, the new model grenadier cap, its function entirely ceremonial, was being introduced. One other thought about survival: bearskin caps were regimental property and so this would be more likely to have been kept by an officer when the 1768 cap was superceded by the next model, ca. 1800, and then passed on in who-knows-what series of gifts or transactions but kept safe. The organic nature of the material means this kind of survival is rare but clearly it has been possible.
  10. There's more out there, Let your fingers do the walking...
  11. here's a start http://www.thehighlandersmuseum.com/a-look-at-the-cameron-highlanders-role-in-ww2/ light khaki, ToS bonnet, Sam Brown, leather purse sporran, khaki hose JF
  12. The soldier on the left is Black Watch (RH); on the right is most likely a Seaforth Highlander. Sporran cantle and cap badge would confirm.
  13. Monique, greetings. I know you have decided not to use the artefact in your display but you may be interested to know that some infantry regiments did have non-regulation badges with regimental insignia attached to the flap of their cartridge pouches. The single cartridge pouch hanging from a shoulder belt on the right hip, was superceded in the mid-1860s by the Valise equipment (the first integrated system of load-bearing equipment with twin waist-pouches) , although some regiments in India were still wearing the old pouch in the 1880s. I wonder, given the trapezoid shape, whether this might more likely than a shoulder belt plate. It shouldn't be too difficult identifying regiments that used the PoW feathers insignia with those posted to NSW in the 1850s. As you probably know, the 77th East Middlesex Regt were briefly in NSW 1857-58. In 1810 the PoW feathers “used as regimental badge for sometime past ” were officially recognised. In 1854 the PoW feathers ornamented regimental buttons and also the crossbelt plate with the motto “Ich Dien.” Could there be a connection with the name of the colony?