Jump to content
News Ticker
  • I am now accepting the following payment methods: Card Payments, Apple Pay, Google Pay and PayPal
    • Latest News

    andy

    Past Contributor
     View Profile  See their activity

    • Posts

      366

    • Joined

    • Last visited

     Content Type 

    Everything posted by andy

    1. andy
      ...
    2. andy
      rear
    3. andy
      Hi I just picked this one up and would like to know if this model of cross is considered to be wartime manufacture or later. comes complete in its case with a label on the lid that I cannot make out. any thoughts thanks andy
    4. andy
      Many thanks again for your help. Anyone have any thoughts on the packet? regards andy
    5. andy
      cross and packet
    6. andy
      hi I could do with some help with this one please. Is it simply confirmation of issue of an EK2 that was requested in 1934?.What is the reference to 14.10.1883 about-is this just his date of birth? Came with a KM marked cross and a waxy type paper packet that i have never seen before. any thoughts? thnaks andy
    7. andy
      Micha do you know if this type of plate is only to this maker or have you come across it on other makers crosses. I only ask as I have a cross with the same rear plate but not maker marked thanks andy
    8. andy
      Anyone help? thnaks andy
    9. andy
      3
    10. andy
      pic 2
    11. andy
      Hi This cross is non magnetic and marked 800 on the frame.Not one I have come across and therefore I have my doubts about it but would appreciate other opinions.It weights in at 22.6g many thanks andy
    12. andy
      ek2
    13. andy
      last
    14. andy
      rear
    15. andy
      Hi I would appreciate your help here please.Firstly,any ideas as to the maker of the EK1 and secondly, I would appreciate your views on the RW packet. I have a couple of these blue packets maked KO but this is the first time I have seen an RW marked packet.The cross is also marked RW although I had this before the packet so they did not come together thanks andy
    16. andy
      mm
    17. andy
      The rear
    18. andy
      Just received this cross . I have compared it to the cross recently posted in theis thread: http://gmic.co.uk/index.php?showtopic=21284 and it looks ok to me although the MM is in a different place. Shame about the paint work, looks like someone has either tried to touch it up or clean it?Is there anything that can be done or is it best left as is? Would appreciate opinions thnaks andy
    19. andy
      Hi Mike Frame looks good. I do not think this has been mesed with. See this thread: http://gmic.co.uk/index.php?showtopic=3691&hl=mayer regards andy
    20. andy
      Thanks Joe Yes it is. regards andy
    21. andy
      rear
    22. andy
      Hi Can anyone see any problems with this one? cheers andy
    23. andy
      Sorry,forgot,here is the sinature on the EK certificate regards andy
    24. andy
      last
    25. andy
      Many thanks indeed that is exactly what I was looking for. These are the last couple of pages from the book. They look like they have been cut down in size. Does this tell us anything else after 1916? Once again, many thanks andy
    ×
    ×
    • Create New...

    Important Information

    We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.