-
Posts
352 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Events
Store
Everything posted by joerookery
-
I don't know if I totally agree with that. It really depends upon the individual unit. Some came from a parent active regiment but others were formed from all sorts of different sources. I would also caution that the numbers align with each other. Sometimes they do -- most times they do not. Things get pretty complicated when you overlay the political boundaries and the fact that regiments actually moved. Sometimes it is just so complex I cannot figure it all out. For instance, this morning I was looking at LIR 87. I do not understand what relationship existed between this Hessian regiment and Mecklenburg. The parent line is far too simplistic and it got worse as the war progressed. I think in the handbook of Imperial Germany there is a good example of JR 31. I think there is a reason why most sourcebooks disregard reserve and Landwehr formations -- it is just too hard and no one has figured it out yet. Great subject though! You also get into confusions about where the guard uniforms came from in units like RJR 202. Sometimes it's simple but sometimes...
-
Bob, The best way to buy is through the link above to go straight to the publisher. is far better faster and cheaper that way. I really am having some problems dealing with the Zuber book. I have so much to read on this but I think many different thoughts and he should have read the Handbook. http://www.authorhouse.com/BookStore/ItemDetail.aspx?bookid=60521
-
I don't know -- this really was a stretch for me to begin with as I was brought up with the Napoleonic understanding of Cavalry including middle cavalry. Then there was all the British influence in the combining of Lancers and Hussars. Dr. Buchholz' groupings were formed from German doctrinal writings. The German/English/French correlations do not seem to always work.
-
Thanks for the kind words! I am really glad it is delivering for you. I have had a few e-mails asking why we didn't do the Navy. That was an intentional act. The intent of the book was to focus on the Army. As we didn't think there was anything in the English language that explained the Army in this way. While not the same, I think Holger Herwig did the Navy some justice in his book "luxury fleet". While he didn't do the social stuff, or the political stuff. It is still a good read about the Navy. We will try to include that if there ever is a second edition. If we do that, we will also increase the size of the pictures to help the contrast on some of the maps and our biggest gripe of all.--- We did not include an index at the end. That makes it harder for people to look things up. Just goes to show how much of a rank amateur operation we are! But we have had fun.
-
I would just like to back up what Rick said here. We did not cover the Navy in our recent book and have been researching that a bit. The naval officer corps was very very very stratified. It defies logic and is purely only social discrimination that to me makes little sense, but it certainly was present. Engineers was a subcategory that really took it on the chin.
-
I'm sorry about the shipping! The book weighs 1.7 pounds. Perhaps there is another way to skin the cat. The book is now available at Barnes & Noble's, Amazon, etc. perhaps ordering through them might be somewhat cheaper for the shipping to Australia. $36 is pretty shocking. The retail price of the book goes up five dollars, but perhaps the shipping goes down quite a bit. isbn 9781449021139 They have profoundly mucked up the review copies. Both time and money will go to try to fix this problem.