DavidM Posted August 22, 2006 Posted August 22, 2006 HelloI've just got this KVK 2 with swords and packet of issue. The KVK is marked '19' on the ring for E. Ferd. Wiedmann, Frankfurt am Main. It all looks good to me.As usual any comments or observations welcomed.Thanks for looking.
Laurence Strong Posted August 22, 2006 Posted August 22, 2006 (edited) Hi DavidFrom what I can see the cross looks OK, can't say on the envelope other than the fact the 2 don't go together as the envelope is for K&Q MM65.Here's my MM19 for you to compare to. Hope this helps Edited August 22, 2006 by Laurence Strong
DavidM Posted August 22, 2006 Author Posted August 22, 2006 HelloThanks for that Laurence. The maker mark on mine matches yours exactly, and the KVKs look the same as well. I know the paper packet doesn't match to the maker of the KVK, but that's how Detlev sold it - I suppose some sort of mix and match !I don't know much about paper packets, but from what little I do know, plus information from on the forums, I think this one is ok. Hopefully someone may be able to say ?
Laurence Strong Posted August 22, 2006 Posted August 22, 2006 Hi DavidI changed my photo a bit, I am glad the MM match's almost looks like a 13 Marcus H is the paper packets guru, and from what I can tell also it appears good.
DavidM Posted August 22, 2006 Author Posted August 22, 2006 HelloI know what you mean. It took me a while to decipher mine as '19', but that's what it is.Thanks.
Laurence Strong Posted August 22, 2006 Posted August 22, 2006 (edited) Here's the only KvK2 w/ swords packet I have. I am going to re scan it as it was too high a resolution Edited August 22, 2006 by Laurence Strong
Marcus H Posted August 22, 2006 Posted August 22, 2006 (edited) Did you draw that Laurence (nice to see the maker Souval actually on a KVK packet, you see an abundance of all insundry of makers and this maker you'd expect to be no different, but I seldom see it on KVK packets.........just as a note and meaningless observation)David,I just commented on the WAF on this, but it looks just fine and nothing to worry about in the packet regard.KrMarcus Edited August 22, 2006 by Marcus H
Laurence Strong Posted August 22, 2006 Posted August 22, 2006 LOL no, just a size envy I fixed it to be a little better. And I know where the confirmation is for this one on WAF
DavidM Posted August 23, 2006 Author Posted August 23, 2006 HelloThanks to both of you for your comments and assistance.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now