John Posted June 17, 2004 Posted June 17, 2004 Today's superior tank has to be the Merkava. The IDF have the most modern tank fighting experience in the world, and consequently developed their own armour through that experience. Their main aim was crew survival and protection, and firing first, which why the commander's job was the most dangerous as they always had their heads exposed. The tank is the world's heaviest, but still has an extremely low silhouette, particularly the turret, which has no ammunition stored above the turret ring. The Merkava is also one of the only tanks to the engine at the front for that extra bit of protection. It has an enormous array of weaponry, and the later MKs have 360 degree cctv built into it. All in all , awesome.
Craig Posted June 18, 2004 Posted June 18, 2004 Is this tank a completely Israeli design or is it cobbled together from other vehicles ?
Firefly Posted June 18, 2004 Posted June 18, 2004 What does Mr Vice Chairman think of a Challenger 2 vs Merkava 4 scenario? Is the Challenger a better 'all round' MBT, the Merkava being more specific in it's role? I would have said Challenger myself, but the Mk4 Merkava really does narrow the margin between them.
John Posted June 19, 2004 Author Posted June 19, 2004 On its own ground, definitely the Merkava. It could be a tricky one, as their concepts are different. The Merkava was certainly not built for speed or manoeverability. It was built for maximum protection. It also stores a large array of weapons ans has an enormous amount of ammunition. It is designed to stay on the battle field for long periods of time, pretty much self contained. The Challenger 2 certainly is well up there, but seems to have manoevreability, as one of its characteristics as well as massive slabbed armour. It seems to more of an offensive MBT , with all the armament emphasis around the main gun. The Merkava has all sorts on it from grenade launcher, 60mm mortar, .50 cal, 7.62mm, as well as some reports stating that it can now launch missiles down its barrel.It is also more of a defensive tank, designed to protect Israel from some of its neighbours.... wub.gif
Biscuit Brown Posted December 15, 2004 Posted December 15, 2004 What about the Soviet T-95 Blackhawk tank. They have massive armour and a 140mm main gun.
Firefly Posted December 18, 2004 Posted December 18, 2004 All these new variants of the Russian designs have me confused!Is the 'Black Hawk' you're referring to also known as the 'Black Eagle' or Chiormy Oriol?I've got a couple of pictures of it in a book at an arms fair a few years back. The turret was covered in a net but is a radical departure from the traditional dome-type, being much more like a Abrams. I presume this is to allow better protection for the crew from the rounds.The chassis is almost exactly the same as a T80 but i think it has thicker armour as you say....Time for a Google search me thinks........
Guest kaktus Posted January 10, 2005 Posted January 10, 2005 The Black Eagle has not even gone into production yet, the only units in exsistence are believed to be the prototypes...I do know one thing, there is a 152mm main gun being developed that is supposed to be mounted on that moth!
John Posted January 16, 2005 Author Posted January 16, 2005 Hi Kaktus, Welcome aboard. I thought the 'moth' had gone into production, but was being kept well away from observers. Yes and the gun is a beast... wub.gif
Bob Hunter Posted June 21, 2005 Posted June 21, 2005 Can the Merkava and/or the Blackhawk see the Apache or Warthog that is about to kill it?
Firefly Posted June 23, 2005 Posted June 23, 2005 Can the Merkava and/or the Blackhawk see the Apache or Warthog that is about to kill it?←They'd probably both outrun the warthog!!!!
Guest paracollector Posted July 10, 2005 Posted July 10, 2005 The Merkava is pretty much an all Isreali design, tailored for specific Isreali needs. For instance, the engine placement has nothing to do with crew protection (makes good PR though), but rather to allow a supply vehicle to back up to it and resupply the vehicle through a hatch on the back of the hull (everynoe gets to stay under cover). The vehicle is designed to engage enemy armor at the greatest distance posible from prepared, or expediant positions, and survive close encounters with RPGs on city streets. Against almost any modern western tank on open ground it would not have a chance. The tank is to slow, not manueverable enough, and its turret traverse is nothing to brag about.But it does look pretty cool.
Guest sniper1shot Posted July 14, 2005 Posted July 14, 2005 I was always told and had read that the Merkava has the engine placement to create a pocket in the rear to store extra ammo OR to carry troops (Can't remember the number of though). After the last war they found that many combat troops were just by-passed and had to fend for themselves......however armoured "thrusts" were able make small penentrations to rescue them. Hence, the need for space.....or if going into a defensive posn, more ammo. The Merkava was also designed off of the US M60 and captured examples of the Soviet design tanks from Syria. They liked the low profile of the Soviet designs however liked the crew protection and commanders protection. As for survivability on the battlefield, I can't comment as I don't know.
John Posted July 14, 2005 Author Posted July 14, 2005 Interesting. I was always lead to believe that it was the worlds top design. I think that the Israeli's have more post wwii tank battle experience than any other nation. I would like to see it up against a Challenger 2 or an M1 Abrams, though. I must admit, though, the Israeli's have always fought in defence of their homeland, so it would be interesting to see how they fayred in another theatre. Regards, John
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now