naoki matsumoto Posted July 6, 2007 Posted July 6, 2007 Hi,Jacques. New collection's Spanienkreuz CEJ900 & 835. 835 with orijinal case.Sorry, How think about these. Please,I want to hear your opinions.Thank you.
Riley1965 Posted July 9, 2007 Posted July 9, 2007 Hello Aoki!! These are GREAT looking SCs I have enjoyed looking at your impressive SCW & LC collection You have a lot to be proud of!!! Doc
naoki matsumoto Posted July 9, 2007 Author Posted July 9, 2007 both are original, with a good aged patina. .jacquesSorry,Very thanks Jacques!! I will try to get some "splendid Spanienkreuz".Thank you Jacques.
naoki matsumoto Posted July 9, 2007 Author Posted July 9, 2007 Hello Aoki!! These are GREAT looking SCs I have enjoyed looking at your impressive SCW & LC collection You have a lot to be proud of!!! DocHi,Doc!! I am glad, your e-mail!! Thank you.Spanienkreuz Gold is CEJ900 of near mint.I will try to get some Spanienkreuz Gold & Silber!!Thank you!!
naoki matsumoto Posted September 3, 2007 Author Posted September 3, 2007 http://gmic.co.uk/uploads/monthly_07_2007/post-2715-1183765330.jpghttp://gmic.co.uk/uploads/monthly_07_2007/post-2715-1183765344.jpgHi,Jacques. New collection's Spanienkreuz CEJ900 & 835. 835 with orijinal case.Sorry, How think about these. Please,I want to hear your opinions.Thank you. I am happy! I will try to get another one!!
Sal Williams Posted September 8, 2007 Posted September 8, 2007 Both look good but I don't know how one can be certain without reverse pics?
Jacques Posted September 9, 2007 Posted September 9, 2007 Both look good but I don't know how one can be certain without reverse pics?Of course it is difficult to be affirmative observing only the obverse of a cross, but in that very case, the 2 crosses retain all the details of the announced marking. The patina is exactly what we can expect and for me there is no doubt. Of course, if I get them in hand, I would have a look on the reverse to see which kind of marking variant the Juncker have. Jacques
Sal Williams Posted September 9, 2007 Posted September 9, 2007 Of course it is difficult to be affirmative observing only the obverse of a cross, but in that very case, the 2 crosses retain all the details of the announced marking. The patina is exactly what we can expect and for me there is no doubt. Of course, if I get them in hand, I would have a look on the reverse to see which kind of marking variant the Juncker have. JacquesI agree Jacques, but better if reverse pics are always posted, one never knows
naoki matsumoto Posted September 10, 2007 Author Posted September 10, 2007 Thank you Jacques & Sal!! Thank you for good opinion again! In addition, I post a detailed photograph. I feel glad.
naoki matsumoto Posted September 2, 2008 Author Posted September 2, 2008 http://gmic.co.uk/uploads/monthly_07_2007/post-2715-1183765330.jpghttp://gmic.co.uk/uploads/monthly_07_2007/post-2715-1183765344.jpgHi,Jacques. New collection's Spanienkreuz CEJ900 & 835. 835 with orijinal case.Sorry, How think about these. Please,I want to hear your opinions.Thank you.By the way, what manufacturers would 835 silver be? After all may not the carved seal of the company name specify that there is not it?As for the Silver and Gold, which manufacturer will be the rarest? .
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now