EK 1939 Low swastika

[Ronny]

Hi, next cross

I have this EKII 39

My concern about the cross is the very low

Swastika, is that a problem?

Is it a unmark 100?

Thanks again,

Ronny.

[Ronny]

Back..

[Ronny]

And 3D.

[Tony]

Hello Ronny,

Here's my 100 for comparison.

I'm afraid all those TR EKs look the same to me if you cover up the bump on the top of the 100s.

Tony

[Tony]

They look the same to me.

[Ronny]

Wow that is a beautiful cross you got there.

Thanks Tony.

[David Gregory]

Tony,

Spiffy cross. Is that one I saw at Wewelsburg castle last year?

Cheers,

David

[Tony]

Tony,

Spiffy cross. Is that one I saw at Wewelsburg castle last year?

Cheers,

David

←

Hmmm,

I have 2 of them, one in the packet and one on a safety pin which I call dead mans cross (pictured above) as it was probably used for several casualties. I usually only show the dead mans cross but I'm not sure which one I took to Wewelsburg.

The one in the packet is just as spiffy.

Tony

[Guest Darrell]

Actually guys .... I don't believe this is a unmarked "100". I'm pretty sure its an unmarked Juncker instead.

The tell tale squished beading where the 12 oclock and 3 oclock arms meet is not present on Ronny's, plus the "3" in the 1813 date doesnt match to a "100".

The numbers look pretty close to a Juncker. Plus the fact you can see some cross hatching at the inside corners of the beading as well

[Ronny]

Interesting Darrell, Thanks.

Anyone have a good picture of an L/12 for

Comparison?

Some more pictures.

Ronny.

[Guest Darrell]

Hi Ronny,

Got any closeups of the corners that touch the Swastika?

[Ronny]

Hi Darrell,

Here is a close-up picture

The core is very lose and rattles

when I shake the cross.

Regards,

Ronny.

[Ronny]

And,