Oberst General Posted September 6, 2005 Posted September 6, 2005 http://www.wehrmacht-awards.com/forums/sho...ad.php?t=116830Hello all,Ca anyone shed light on the link above.Maybe it's just me, by it sounds like alot of double talk is going on?First it's bad, then i might be okay, Do the statements hold water?
Mike Posted September 12, 2005 Posted September 12, 2005 (edited) It's a real S&L RK (Type A frame) but ...no one can ID the core because of the thin 1939 date. They are not sure if S&L used an early thinner style font for the numerals like Juncker. So ...the mystery continues Edited September 12, 2005 by Mike
Gordon Williamson Posted September 13, 2005 Posted September 13, 2005 It's a real S&L RK (Type A frame) but ...no one can ID the core because of the thin 1939 date. They are not sure if S&L used an early thinner style font for the numerals like Juncker. So ...the mystery continues ←Not such a huge mystery Mike. You can find minor differences in the cores of other RK makers ( i.e. Juncker - not every one of their RK have identical cores).From the images you sent me, you have a perfectly good original S&L RK.
Mike Posted September 13, 2005 Posted September 13, 2005 Thanks Gordon ...I'm very happy with it and , I hope it's the first of many for me(nice to dream huh?)The 1939 font looks like the style used on the EK's ...I have a feeling it's an early style S&L RK because the early Juncker had thin numerals as well . Maybe they decided to make the date bolder the same way they decided to make the EKll larger early on. Maybe someday a document or explanation will surface .Glad I got it !!thanks again
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now