KDVR Posted January 18, 2009 Posted January 18, 2009 Hello friendsHere you can see some pictures of an imperial belt buckle. 1. Is it original?2. Which period?3. How much is its value?Thank you :jumping:
Minen Posted January 20, 2009 Posted January 20, 2009 Hi,It seems to be original.Do you have the size of this buckle ?Stephan
KDVR Posted January 21, 2009 Author Posted January 21, 2009 Hi StephanThe size is 6.3 cm x 4.7 cm :jumping:
Minen Posted January 22, 2009 Posted January 22, 2009 Hi,It's a M95.It was on used during 1895-1915.Regards,Stephan
lach470 Posted February 5, 2009 Posted February 5, 2009 Yup....no worries there.....it's an original piece.Rob
nesredep Posted February 6, 2009 Posted February 6, 2009 Hello!Looks good to me.Congrats and thanks for showing. All the bestNesredep
lugerholsterrepair Posted May 23, 2009 Posted May 23, 2009 Gentlemen, The belt prongs seem to have an unusual cut..usually associated with fakes. The rest of the buckle looks alright but these don't square with the rest. Jerry Burney
lach470 Posted May 23, 2009 Posted May 23, 2009 If you are thinking of the reverse cut prongs that we often see on reproductions, these aren't quite like that. I see what you mean about the cut on the end....but these aren't the same IMO. This buckle looks right to me. Rob
lugerholsterrepair Posted May 23, 2009 Posted May 23, 2009 Rob, Yes..exactly what I think, the buckle looks right but the prongs look like no Imperial I have ever seen. Looked at closely they are extremely sharply pointed, unneccessarily so. There is also another unusual trait to these prongs..it appears that wire was used to hold them on for the soldering process? Another thing I have never seen. I am curious to know if the roller tube is split? It is not shown in the photo's. Jerry Burney
lach470 Posted May 27, 2009 Posted May 27, 2009 I would think that there is no sleeve on the prong bar by the looks of it. I do see the wire that could have been used to keep the prongs on the bar during the solder. That is something that I've never seen .... but one must keep in mind that ww1 buckles were manufactured by many a firm and each one had it's own way of making these buckles. There are more variants when it comes to ww1 army buckles than there are when it comes to ww2 army buckles.Cheers!Rob
lugerholsterrepair Posted May 29, 2009 Posted May 29, 2009 Here is an amazing coincedence! This buckle to be found on Ebay has the SAME wire wrap found on the buckle in question above! It has MUCH different belt prong points however. I have looked at thousands of Imperial buckles and it seems something new is appearing. http://cgi.ebay.com/WWI-Imperial-German-Be...1QQcmdZViewItemJerry Burney
Tom Y Posted May 30, 2009 Posted May 30, 2009 I seem to remember having a similar one but can't seem to find it or even a scan of it. Will keep looking.
lach470 Posted June 19, 2009 Posted June 19, 2009 A couple days ago - I received a Bavarian 1895 pattern buckle to add to my collection. When looking at the prong bar - I noticed a similar "wire" attachment on the back.....It automatically made me think of this previous post so I thought I'd take some pics and post them here. Same maker? Who knows....maybe there were more than just one maker that used this technique. Cheers!Rob
Tom Y Posted June 21, 2009 Posted June 21, 2009 A couple days ago - I received a Bavarian 1895 pattern buckle to add to my collection. When looking at the prong bar - I noticed a similar "wire" attachment on the back.....It automatically made me think of this previous post so I thought I'd take some pics and post them here. Same maker? Who knows....maybe there were more than just one maker that used this technique. Cheers!RobI have serious doubts about this one. I recently picked up a Prussian one on eBay with the same wire on the prongs. The heavy verdigris on yours where the belt end would have been is convincing, but the appearance of two with the previously unknown thin wire wrapping seems a bit more than coincidence. There are at least three companies selling high quality repros but unfortunately none of them show the backs.
lugerholsterrepair Posted June 21, 2009 Posted June 21, 2009 Tom, Rob, I am interested to know from you both if the roller tube the prongs are attached to is split along it's length? I cannot see from the photo's if this tube is split anywhere. The reason I ask is..the split must be there. If you encounter an unsplit tube..this metal technolodgy did not exist in WW1 but is common today. Jerry Burney
Tom Y Posted June 21, 2009 Posted June 21, 2009 Tom, Rob, I am interested to know from you both if the roller tube the prongs are attached to is split along it's length? I cannot see from the photo's if this tube is split anywhere. The reason I ask is..the split must be there. If you encounter an unsplit tube..this metal technolodgy did not exist in WW1 but is common today. Jerry BurneySplit
lach470 Posted June 22, 2009 Posted June 22, 2009 HMMMMM......On my example it is split right close to the prongs...but I have a tombak buckle that shows no split....and possibly more.....Are you sure about the technology??Cheers!Rob
Tom Y Posted June 22, 2009 Posted June 22, 2009 HMMMMM......On my example it is split right close to the prongs...but I have a tombak buckle that shows no split....and possibly more.....Are you sure about the technology??Cheers!RobI think if you look closely you'll see a fine soldered seam.
lugerholsterrepair Posted June 22, 2009 Posted June 22, 2009 Rob, Not 100% but I am certain this subject came up in one of my many Belt Buckle Books and was a sure indicator of a repro. Just another thing to look for to analize originality. If I come accross it again I will reference it here. Jerry Burney
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now