hipnos Posted February 8, 2009 Posted February 8, 2009 This is the pic. The quality is very low , but I would to know the unit (Fusilier'??), grade (Starschina leutnenant??), and some hint about the feat... I understand they ask the Military merit and that he has already a red star order, victory over germany and defense of leningrad, medals, (an a veteran one I think.. )Sorry Rick, for the hard work to your eye... Regards and thanksmiguel
Guest Rick Research Posted February 8, 2009 Posted February 8, 2009 Maybe if I had a lunar telescope.... :cheeky:
marcotk Posted February 8, 2009 Posted February 8, 2009 (edited) Name looks like Volokitin Grigorij Nikiforovich, Chief of the ... of a battalion of the Budapest (?) Order of Aleksander Nevskj Regiment of the MVD troops.. And yes, a Senior LieutenantIt is pretty small The doc looks authentic but there is no way to prove it belongs to the awards (unless of course, researching).. anyway thats a pretty sad example of how to create a "I researched my order but found nothing" :angry: Edited February 8, 2009 by marcotk
hipnos Posted February 8, 2009 Author Posted February 8, 2009 Name looks like Volokitin Grigorij Nikiforovich, Chief of the ... of a battalion of the Budapest (?) Order of Aleksander Nevskj Regiment of the MVD troops.. And yes, a Senior LieutenantIt is pretty small The doc looks authentic but there is no way to prove it belongs to the awards (unless of course, researching).. anyway thats a pretty sad example of how to create a "I researched my order but found nothing" The whole thing is on the way home...So don?t worry , we?ll made a research as/if neccesary...Thanksmiguel
hipnos Posted February 8, 2009 Author Posted February 8, 2009 Maybe if I had a lunar telescope.... Sorry Rick, You will be the first to get a better copy as soon as the parcel came home.Thanks as everYours Miguel
hipnos Posted February 9, 2009 Author Posted February 9, 2009 Sorry Rick, You will be the first to get a better copy as soon as the parcel came home.Thanks as everYours Miguel As Promised to Rick...1st half
hipnos Posted February 9, 2009 Author Posted February 9, 2009 (edited) 2nd. half. Where you can see tht the Tovarich was not a special recommended guy, being hardrinking and making a shabby work at the Garrison...I thnk they don?t want to give him the Military merit.... Edited February 9, 2009 by hipnos
hipnos Posted February 9, 2009 Author Posted February 9, 2009 The 2nd reverse half...Thnaks to allMiguel
Guest Rick Research Posted February 9, 2009 Posted February 9, 2009 :Cat-Scratch: This is the very first time I have seen DOCUMENTATION of a routine long service award being WITHHELD for bad behaviour and poor performance. As you already notte-- his 10 years MMM was rejected and held back for a year as punishment.I have also never seen service records for the "police" services before. These are all very clear and will be easy to work through, but I've just had an unexpected situation come up that means I can't get to this today. :cheers:
hipnos Posted February 9, 2009 Author Posted February 9, 2009 (edited) deleted Edited February 9, 2009 by hipnos
hipnos Posted February 9, 2009 Author Posted February 9, 2009 (edited) Deleted Edited February 9, 2009 by hipnos
hipnos Posted February 9, 2009 Author Posted February 9, 2009 (edited) This is the very first time I have seen DOCUMENTATION of a routine long service award being WITHHELD for bad behaviour and poor performance. As you already notte-- his 10 years MMM was rejected and held back for a year as punishment.I have also never seen service records for the "police" services before. These are all very clear and will be easy to work through, but I've just had an unexpected situation come up that means I can't get to this today. I?ll be very pleased to send you (at your personal email adress - or postal if you prefer) full size scans of the doc...RegardsMiguel Edited February 9, 2009 by hipnos
hipnos Posted February 11, 2009 Author Posted February 11, 2009 Here you have the traduction of the reprobed leutenantFor 11 Years and 2 Months of Service in the Forces, MVD, and PoliceAward Sheet1. Last name, name, and patrionymic: Volokitin, Grigorii Nikiforovich2. Rank: Senior Lieutenant3. Duty position and place of service: Garrison Chief ? 4 Type, 2 Battalion, 62 Regiment, MVD Forces for Guarding Special Industrial and Railroad Sites [trans: 336 Budapest Order of Alexander Nevsky crossed out, probably due to a unit redesignation]4. Duty description according to MVD Order 0310 dated 1946: Officer Duty, Position #84Award Application for the Combat Service Medal5. Birthyear: 19206. Nationality: Ukrainian7. Party membership: n/a 8. Place of birth: Shubino village, Ostrogozhskii Region, Voronezh Oblast9. Combat experience: participant of the Great Patriotic War in the 23 MVD Division, was attached to the 117 Rifle Regiment, 47 Rifle Division, Kalinin Front 4.1942-9.1942, 253 Regiment, 53 Division, Leningrad Front 8.1943-10.4310. Wounds or shell-shock: Two light wounds in the right arm and leg and one incident of shell-shock, all in the Great Patriotic War11. Service in the VChK, OGPU, NKVD, NKGB, MVD: since 1 July 1940, no service in the Armed Forces12. Earlier decorations: Red Star by Order 01147/11 of the Leningrad Front dated 22.7.45, Defense of Leningrad Medal, Victory over Germany Medal, and 30th Anniversary of the Soviet Armed Forces Medal13. Home of record: Korolevo village, Sevlyushskii Okrug, Zakarpate Oblast He is dedicated to the Party of Lenin-Stalin and the Socialist Motherland. He is morally stalwart, however while on the garrison during duty he has been intoxicated. He is ideologically sound. He is politically developed. He is insufficiently self-disciplined. He is not very demanding of himself or his subordinates. He is not seriously engaged with his assigned duties. The garrison is sufficiently trained. Military discipline and order in the garrison is not at its required levels. His garrison accomplished the 1, 2, and 3 range firing tables with excellent results. He is concerned about his subordinates. He does not command sufficient authority within the unit. In 1948 he was expelled from the Party. His performance corresponds to his assigned duty as Chief of Garrison, 2 Battalion. Until the specified deficiencies have been corrected, his awarding for long service should be denied.Signed 20 July 1950, Colonel IgnatevEndorsed ? Awarding for long service withheld until correction of noted deficiencies in service and personal behavior.Signed Commander, 32 Division, Colonel Lipetskii on 4 August 1950Dates Time Duty Position Unit Location1.7.40-1.9.40 2 mos Private 234 Regt, Convoy Troops, NKVD Novosibirsk1.9.40-1.3.41 6 mos Cadet 1 Moscow Commander School Moscow1.3.41-1.5.41 2 mos Deputy Platoon Leader 234 Regt, Convoy Troops, NKVD Novosibirsk1.5.41-1.12.41 7 mos Cadet Saratov Border Academy NKVD Saratov1.12.41-1.4.42 4 mos Chief of Garrison 51 Regt, Railroad Forces, NKVD Leningrad1.4.42-31.5.42 1yr, 29d In reserves 23 Div, Railroad Forces, NKVD Leningrad31.5.42-19.12.42 6mos MG Platoon Leader 32 Independent Reserve Battalion Bodogoe 19 days Railroad Forces, NKVD Station19.12.42-15.6.43 5mos MG Platoon Leader 52 Regt, Railroad Forces, NKVD Volkhov 26 days 15.6.43-17.3.45 1yr, MG Platoon Leader Division Commanders School Leningrad 9mos, 2 days 23 Division17.3.45-4.5.45 1mo, 17dMG Platoon Leader 210 Regt, Railroad Forces, NKVD Leningrad4.5.45-13.8.46 1yr,3mo Deputy Battalion 51 Regt, Railroad Forces, NKVD Leningrad 9 days Chief of Staff13.8.46-21.1.47 5mo,8d Deputy Regimental 336 Budapest Order of Alexander Nevsky MukachevoChemical Officer Regt, 32 Division MVD Forces for Guarding Special Industrial and Railroad Sites, MVD 21.1.47-13.8.48 1yr6mo Chief Chemical Officer Same Same13.8.48-25.3.49 7m,12d Chief of Garrison Same Same25.3.49-1.7.49 3m,6d Chief of Reserve Garrison Same1.7.49-9.1.50 1y,6m,8d Chief of Garrison Same Same9.1.51-1.9.51 7m,22d Chief of (?) 62 Regt, 52 Division, MVD LvovInformation compiled and verified on the basis of personnel file.Signed Chief Personnel Officer, 32 Division, MVD Forces, Lieutenant Colonel Korolev on 2 August 1950sorry for the format.regardsMiguel
Guest Rick Research Posted February 11, 2009 Posted February 11, 2009 :jumping: I knew somebody else would do it if I just hung back. there is only 1 "me" after all! Drunk... inefficient... disrespected by his men... but could have been ... worse? Makes me wonder what his Captain's review said for not slapping some sense into this sub-par Lieutenant under HIS command! :rolleyes:
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now