Kev in Deva Posted November 7, 2009 Posted November 7, 2009 Is the ring a split ring? and could it be a replacement for an original ribbon ring? Kevin in Deva. :beer:
avadski Posted November 7, 2009 Author Posted November 7, 2009 (edited) Kev, the ring looks to be original, not a later replacement. I believe that it's either an inspection mark or initials of the recipient. Franken, thanks for the identification. Since this was, as you stated, a later variant could this be the early type made by Hemmerle: Swords are completely different and they are attached little bit higher than on the later type. Thanks in advance. Edited November 7, 2009 by avadski
Franken75 Posted November 8, 2009 Posted November 8, 2009 Kev, the ring looks to be original, not a later replacement. I believe that it's either an inspection mark or initials of the recipient. Franken, thanks for the identification. Since this was, as you stated, a later variant could this be the early type made by Hemmerle: Swords are completely different and they are attached little bit higher than on the later type. Thanks in advance. That one you have posted now is a Weiss&Co
Franken75 Posted November 8, 2009 Posted November 8, 2009 Is the ring a split ring? and could it be a replacement for an original ribbon ring? Kevin in Deva. Hallo Kevin, of course it could be replaced in old times(maybe a mark from the Jeweler)
avadski Posted March 12, 2010 Author Posted March 12, 2010 Now guys I need your help. This cross is a mystery to me. Swords look like made by Lesser, medallion like from Deschler and the top where the swords are attached to the cross like Lauer. So who actually made it?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now