Brian R Posted December 15, 2014 Posted December 15, 2014 Hi Guys - According to "251 Divisions"... “The 239th Division belonged to the series of 12 divisions (231st to 242nd) formed in Germany at the beginning of 1917, a strong proportion (50%) of the 1918 class. Recruited from the 11th and 18th Corps Districts (electorate of Hesse, Thuringia, and Hesse-Nassua, and the Grand Duchy of Hesse”. In the book, there is no mention of an SA but I have seen reference to it in other places. So, my question is this... were the SA and the division formed simultaneously? In other words, was SA intended to be organic to the division or was it, coincidentally, attached to the division after the division itself was formed? The formation of these divisions is somewhat late and the SA were relatively "established" at this time. So, I'm curious if the formation of these divisions incorporated the inclusion of such specialty units (whether SA or something else). Thanks in advance! Brian
Chris Boonzaier Posted December 15, 2014 Posted December 15, 2014 Hi, The SA on the divisional level (not only the late ones) can be found more or less from 1917 onwards... They are no fixed size and it seems basically to have been up to the division as to how it was composed.. the 204th called theirs the Sturmtrupp Kompagnie... It was taken from units within the division... their denomination was also not official as they were not really recognised outside of their division.... Unlike the orginal "Sturm Abteilung" and the Sturmbataillons that followed...
Chris Boonzaier Posted December 15, 2014 Posted December 15, 2014 Or this Regimental level Stosstrupp......
The Prussian Posted December 16, 2014 Posted December 16, 2014 Helo! Here are a few examples of divisional Stormtroopers and a stamp of the Sturmabteilung/239.Inf.Div.!!!!!!!
Brian R Posted December 18, 2014 Author Posted December 18, 2014 Thanks for the responses. I think my understanding of these units is a bit off. I was under the impression that there were a limited number of Sturm units and that were relatively independent - that they were often attached to divisions or even higher commands. These were the units produced based on the success of the Rohr group. However, I see now that there were all sorts of variations, some larger than others and they could be organized in variable ways. So, in this case, it seems reasonable to assume the Sturm Abteilung of 239 Division was a unit formed from the division? By 1917, did most or all divisions have some kind of Sturm unit - whether battalion, company or even platoon size?
The Prussian Posted December 18, 2014 Posted December 18, 2014 Hi Brian! Yes, that´s right.The mnost of the divisions had their own storm unit. Normally they wered called "Abteilung". Their strength was different. The official units were only 18. Bataillon 1-12 ; 14-17 and two companies (13 and 18, 18 became a bataillon in 1918) A nice book is: Stormtroop tactics, innovation in the german army 1914-1919 by Bruce I. Gudmundsson
Brian R Posted December 18, 2014 Author Posted December 18, 2014 Ah, yes. It all makes more sense now. Thanks for the info and the book rec. I will keep an eye out. Also, do you have a recommendation for reading up on 239 Division as a whole, its make-up and role in the war?
The Prussian Posted December 18, 2014 Posted December 18, 2014 I don´t know if there was a divisional history written.The division had the Inf.Rgt. 466, 467 and 468. By the Entente it was rated at 3rd class and was set-uo early 1917 Theatres: 1917: Champagne and Flandres 1918: Picardy, Illandes, Lorraine, Avricourt and Champagne
Brian R Posted December 20, 2014 Author Posted December 20, 2014 I am interested in an award rendered to a member of the division's Sturm Abteilung on July 17, 1917. So, I will see what I can find about the division's whereabouts and actions in the Champagne region at that time. Thanks again for the feedback.
The Prussian Posted December 20, 2014 Posted December 20, 2014 (edited) Hello Brian! Which award was it? Here is the calendar of that division until end of july 1917. 31.3.-5.4. Stellungskämpfe in der Champagne, 3rd army 6.4.-16.5. Doppelschlacht Aisne-Champagne, 3rd army 21.5.-27.5. Doppelschlacht Aisne-Champagne, 1st army 28.5.-11.10. Stellungskämpfe bei Reims For that period the division was only mentioned once in the Reichsarchiv (vol. XII) 22.-23.5. The 227th and 239th divisions were "task-forces" behind the "Gruppe Prosnes" and the left wing of "Gruppe Reims" The map above shows may, 20. You see the division was transfered from the 3rd army to the 1st army near Juniville. The second map shows that the division changed their position with the 19th division since may 30. These are my only maps about that division. But if he had recieved the award in july, he probably fought for that in the "Stellungskämpfe bei Reims" Edited December 20, 2014 by The Prussian
Brian R Posted December 20, 2014 Author Posted December 20, 2014 Ah, very cool. As I am a WWII guy, I don't have much research material on WWI troops. These maps, and the information you shared, are consistent with the one book I do have - "251 Divisions" states that the division was deployed northeast of Reims at the time (around June 10th, so the May 31st switch shown on the map jives). So, I'm guessing the award is related to trench raiding or some kind of fast attack on or just before the 17th. Oh, and its an engraved EK1, but don't tell Chris.
Chris Boonzaier Posted December 20, 2014 Posted December 20, 2014 Oh, and its an engraved EK1, but don't tell Chris. You are NOT serious??
Brian R Posted December 20, 2014 Author Posted December 20, 2014 (edited) About it being engraved or not telling Chris? Edited December 21, 2014 by Brian R
Brian R Posted December 20, 2014 Author Posted December 20, 2014 It's a tough one to photograph but I will follow up. It was a MAX Show pick-up. I was there to sell, and just after I sold a choice medal bar to Don, this cross came into view. Even without knowing the details about the division and its SA, I knew I couldn't pass it up. Luckily I had the money from the medal bar sale, although the purchase did ultimately go against plans. It's a KAG and here is the obverse...
Brian R Posted December 26, 2014 Author Posted December 26, 2014 Ok, finally... here it is . To a J. Krupp with the division's Sturm Abteilung. The cross is marked KAG and 800 on the pin.
Chris Boonzaier Posted December 26, 2014 Posted December 26, 2014 I like it, it gives a good impression. As always, these depend on your "feelings" for the piece. The only thing that raises a small question mark is the lack of a rank, but there are probably a number of possible reasons for that.
Brian R Posted December 26, 2014 Author Posted December 26, 2014 Hi Chris - Yup, this one I feel very good about. In the world of engraved EKs, this one shows honest wear and consistent patina throughout. You can really see how well it all matches in the area where 239. Inf. Div. is carved out. I find that engraved crosses are especially hard to photograph given the various reflections, but this one is totally convincing in hand.
IrishGunner Posted December 26, 2014 Posted December 26, 2014 Ok, finally... here it is . To a J. Krupp with the division's Sturm Abteilung. The cross is marked KAG and 800 on the pin. I wonder if a member of the "famous" Krupp family...
The Prussian Posted January 1, 2015 Posted January 1, 2015 Hello! I just recieved another example!Sturm-Kompanie of the 22.Res.Div. ' alt='' class='ipsImage' width="1000px" height="647px">' alt='' class='ipsImage' width="1000px" height="647px">
The Prussian Posted March 24, 2015 Posted March 24, 2015 And another one...(Feldpost 951 was attached to 6th. bavarian Landwehr-Division) ' alt='' class='ipsImage' width="1000px" height="641px">' alt='' class='ipsImage' width="1000px" height="641px">
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now