webr55 Posted April 28, 2006 Share Posted April 28, 2006 (edited) EK2 on white-black ribbon, General Honor Decoration (or RAO4?), Hamburg Hanseatenkreuz (colors blurred), Centenary, Weimar Ehrenlegion. What do you think? An NCO-level Beamter with the General Honor Decoration? Or rather a senior one with RAO4? Either way, no long service. Edited November 11, 2017 by webr55 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
webr55 Posted April 28, 2006 Author Share Posted April 28, 2006 (edited) Back: Edited November 11, 2017 by webr55 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stogieman Posted April 28, 2006 Share Posted April 28, 2006 Very interesting "old style" bar. Must have done his one year 1897 and then back for WW1. With the second ribbon, either option, I'll bet he had a schnalle long service. I'm thinking "other ranks". Both the General Decoration and RAO4 would have had a "time served" requirement I believe? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Rick Research Posted April 28, 2006 Share Posted April 28, 2006 I agree about a short timer circa 1897, and hence no long service. The rest could be civilian, rather than military-- maybe railways, gendarmerie or some similar war effort duty. A military offical would have gotten a long service award after the war with continuous pre-1897 service on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
webr55 Posted April 28, 2006 Author Share Posted April 28, 2006 If he had had a Schnalle prewar, I think he would most probably have exchanged it at least postwar. That's why I think he really didn't have a LS. I agree with the civilian theory, no military official. So probably NCO level, with Gen. Hon. Dec. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
webr55 Posted April 28, 2006 Author Share Posted April 28, 2006 BTW, I have a dumb question: Were the Hanseatic Crosses given to soldiers and civilians alike? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Rick Research Posted April 28, 2006 Share Posted April 28, 2006 Yup. That's why I think the whole bar is for a civilian/civil servant in the war effort, rather than military-- because of no long service and dating from the 1920s. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now