Jump to content
News Ticker
  • I am now accepting the following payment methods: Card Payments, Apple Pay, Google Pay and PayPal
  • Latest News

    Identifying uniform


    Recommended Posts

    Hi Everyone,

    This is painted miniature which has been in my family for generations. Of course I have no idea who he was but I am hoping someone can identify the uniform he is wearing. It could be Navey as there is a ship in the background. It looks to me to be early 1800s but thats only a guess. We do have a close connection with India so it might be East India Company or indeed a medical doctor. 

    I greatly look forward to you ideas

     

    Ian 

    Hobart Tasmania

     

    https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/13hjdupc4es37127qnp6c/20231218_170644.jpg?rlkey=8ct8e4q3lcj5tylu3jsfw0sd6&dl=0

    20231218_170644.jpg

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    • 1 month later...
    • 3 weeks later...

    Hi Ian,

    I think Terry might have been referring to the Royal Canadian Navy 👍

     

    I’ve just been having another look, there is a similar style worn by the Royal Navy 1795 - 1812 but not the same.

    Without remembering you mentioning the medical connection I had a look at Naval Surgeon uniforms and there is great similarity, I haven’t found one the same jumping out though.

    The collar is the feature I’ve been trying to match. 

     

    I think that’s where the answer is.

     

    I’d concentrate on finding a Naval Surgeon (Officer equivalent) uniform, from 1800’s, remembering that they each had more than one, formal/informal etc…

     

    Cheers

    tony 🍻 

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    • 2 weeks later...

    Dear  Tony,

    Thankyou so much. It was very kind of you to answer my query and I apologize for nor relying sooner. I thought he may have been Dr William Eatwell. see below BUT his grandmother was Fatima, an Indian from Calcutta so I would have expected him to have dark feature like his half brother, John my gg grandfather. 

    Any thoughts?

    Ian

     

    It has been easier to find details of Dr. William C. B. Eatwell who resided at 98 Marina, St Leonards-on-Sea, presumably from the late 1880s until his death in 1899.

     

    Dr. William Coverdale Beaty (or Beattie) Eatwell (1819–1899). (M.B., C.M., MRCP, FRCP, etc.) 'Surgeon Major' in the Indian Army.

    Born 20th March 1819, Bombay, India. Died on 7th August 1899 in Norwood, Surrey.

     

    The son of Captain William Eatwell (1778–1862) of the Indian Navy, William Coverdale Beattie Eatwell became an Assistant Surgeon in 1841, a Surgeon in 1855 and was appointed Surgeon Major on 11th June 1861. He retired from the Indian Medical Service on 24th February 1863. [See attached record of Indian Medical Service]

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hi Ian,

    I haven’t given up looking, seems if the uniform is depicted correctly he isn’t Royal Navy, I can’t match that collar, though so many variations over the years it’s still possible.

     

    I’m currently tempted to say it’s American, there are similar uniforms I’ve seen 🤷‍♂️ but plenty more to rule out first, I haven’t even started on the ‘Indian Navy’ yet 😊

     

    In the meantime, have you seen this 👇

    you might find it interesting

     

    tony 🍻

     

    https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/83419711/william-eatwell

     

    515309FB-AA26-4E2F-BD31-33C97773E93F.thumb.png.7fc6345b12661dc23e139ab444696712.png
     

    11DBA9FF-9B4B-493C-A4B7-BCED00B032DA.thumb.png.b68aa3f66aaae7be4b0e04675e1b4d81.png

     

    👍

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hi Ian,

    me again 😊

     

    I need to start with a disclaimer 🤷‍♂️
     

    If there’s one thing I learnt the hard way it is just because something you see a picture of, matches the thing you have… it doesn’t mean that there aren’t a dozen other things that match it too.

     

    Traditions, imagery & styles of system, uniform and more have long been adopted, mimicked, inherited etc throughout the world…

    particularly those started by us Brits 🇬🇧

     

    The devil is in the detail.

     

    Having said that…

    I’m now even more convinced the uniform being worn is a US Navy uniform.

     

    I can’t find anything that matches the collar lace of your guy, in particular the extra middle piece, that is except for that of an 1800’s USN Captain.

     

    6C12E985-8021-43E7-9F15-CC69E7713C9D.thumb.png.8b82ad68550240f0ded9bd332bdfe3b8.png

     

    AAB57B85-E9C2-4FE1-A4C3-FE9A53DE0D04.thumb.png.f4633105f54ae4c1654a17c91614e8af.png

     

    The ‘lace’ strip in the middle is the detail I’ve focused on. Officers of many navies have the collar bordered but not that one in the middle…

     

    So eventually I focused on confirming that USN link and found this 👇 site with the most excellent & extensive details.

     

    https://asvab-prep.com/pictorial-history-of-us-navy-uniforms-need-to-know/

     

    You will need to go through it yourself.

    It will be worth it.

    Many of the subtle differences involve cuff stripes, trousers lace, number of buttons or width of lace..,that type of thing, which will be impossible to compare as they are not evident in your portrait.

     

    However…

    it seems navy surgeons wore equivalent uniforms to the regular officers which gave me the encouragement to keep reading through it.

    & then I saw this connection 05A1E45E-6DFD-49F4-AF1A-4AEC6097445F.thumb.jpeg.04b025f13f37dacf8f4f987b01cff249.jpeg


    and that lead to lots of things like this 👇

    D78DE8A6-95AA-434F-924E-AC1C40293566.thumb.png.54d5b167bcb118443e3a3219719eeb84.png

     

    So it turns out there is a significance to this 👇 that i overlooked 🤷‍♂️
    9CC8C97B-B221-4806-B7CF-B7D0D3A9F8E7.thumb.png.0f71a7f396ef38b3b6fa29514ffdc32e.png

     

    So I refer back to my initial disclaimer..,

    Just because this matches, it does not mean that nothing else matches too…’


    But I reckon there is the start of the answer.

     

    Cheers

    tony 🍻

     

    Edited by Farkas
    Spelling
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hi Tony,

    Thankyou so much for you interest and search for details. Do you think he may have been in the British East India Navy which as far as I can tell were run by the British East India Company as a sort of private army until the Mutiny.

    We don't seem to have had any family links to the US.

     

    Thankyou also for the link to find a grave

    Ian

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites


     

    13 hours ago, IanB said:

    We don't seem to have had any family links to the US.

     

    Hi Ian,

    well it seems you might have to find that link 🥴

     

     

    Quick timeline

    - East India company established 1600.

    - Honourable East India company Marine established 1612, it was renamed Bombay Marine in 1686.

    - Bombay Marine came under ‘Royal’ control in 1830 and it was renamed 

    His Majesty’s Indian Navy.

     

    - Until 1745 there was no official British Royal Navy uniform. (article at page end)

    - From 1745 until 1830 the Bombay Marine chose to ‘mimic’ the uniform of the Royal Navy, loosely I imagine.
    - From 1830 His/Her Majesty’s Indian Navy wore the same uniform as the Royal Navy. 

     


    Royal Navy Uniform.

    Only Captains and the 3 Admiral ranks ever wore two epaulettes.

    No rank marks (though officers had lace borders) were worn on the collar, rank stripes are still only worn on the cuffs.

    Other mis matches can be seen too.

    9D4EE499-46C6-40C3-8371-06E481BF8DB1.jpeg.8d5207c8dc919723bc5a2941bbe4f746.jpeg

    D48CE2C5-898C-4D1C-A66B-9AEF7C3DAC26.jpeg.0c4f1c1d9db335545284e525147d716f.jpeg

     

    Surgeon uniforms had no lace border on the collar. They did however have a distinctive insignia on the collar. 
    Clearly unlike that in the portrait.

    49C0214F-8CCA-4601-939B-69DA9B1CC312.thumb.jpeg.1a51a83f4208ff6dbc2b612d86a27967.jpeg


    6C7D4885-02D0-4A81-9B97-65045E78F8B9.thumb.jpeg.00990635dd51dfbb56a61cc305326541.jpeg

     

    4EA821A9-02F1-48EF-A78C-A6EDB85382AA.thumb.jpeg.3d920b21701f2351b87481bc44029eb8.jpeg

     

    This was all new to me just about.

    However I have to reach the conclusion than your portrait does not show a British or Indian Navy uniform… 🤷‍♂️
    That’s no bad thing in my opinion, it’s an interesting new branch on the family tree waiting to be found.


     

    The only matching uniform I found was that of the US Navy (( as explained/pictured best I can in my previous reply 👍))

     

    That revealed the significance of the acorn & leaves attached to your picture, it is his insignia which is, to this day, still the insignia of the…

    U.S. Navy Medical Corps.

     

     

    & That’s all I’ve got!

     

    cheers

    tony🍻

     

     


    👇 From  GlobalSecurity. Org website 

     

    “ The uniform of the Indian Navy has by and large been inherited from the Royal Navy. In that Service, the uniform has evolved over the past 250 years. At the beginning of the eighteenth century, there was no standard uniform for naval personnel, and each ship conformed more or less to the sartorial whims and fancies of her Captain.

    History records that in 1745 a group of British naval officers decided to petition the Admiralty for an official uniform, as was being worn by other navies. This was done, and the Admiralty directed certain officers to appear in what they considered to be a good design. The final decision was to be left to King George II. 

    One day while riding in Hyde Park, the King caught sight of the Duchess of Bedford, wife of the First Lord; who made a lovely picture dressed in a brand new riding habit. The color of the dress was a dark navy blue, with rows of gold buttons down the front, a white collar, and gold lace on the cuffs. The King was so taken up with this colour scheme that he immediately ordered its adoption for his Navy's uniform. There is some speculation that the colors the Duchess was wearing had been selected by her husband. Be that as it may, this was perhaps why the Navy's winter ceremonial uniform became a dark navy blue with a double row of buttons in front, gold stripes depicting rank on the cuffs, a white shirt with stiff collar, and a black tie. 
    The epaulettes worn by all naval officers owe their origin to the French Navy, which passed them on to the British and thence to many other navies of the world. The epaulette is nothing but a decorative amplification of the shoulder strap, whose original function was to prevent the bandolier from slipping off the shoulder. In the early days, Lieutenants wore only one epaulette on their left shoulder. When in command, however, this epaulette was shifted to the right shoulder.”

     

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites


     

    14 hours ago, IanB said:

    We don't seem to have had any family links to the US.

     

    Hi Ian,

    well it seems you might have to find that link 🥴

     

     

    Quick timeline

    - East India company established 1600.

    - Honourable East India company Marine established 1612, it was renamed Bombay Marine in 1686.

    - Bombay Marine came under ‘Royal’ control in 1830 and it was renamed 

    His Majesty’s Indian Navy.

     

    - Until 1745 there was no official British Royal Navy uniform. (article at page end)

    - From 1745 until 1830 the Bombay Marine chose to ‘mimic’ the uniform of the Royal Navy, loosely I imagine.
    - From 1830 His/Her Majesty’s Indian Navy wore the same uniform as the Royal Navy. 

     


    Royal Navy Uniform.

    Only Captains and the 3 Admiral ranks ever wore two epaulettes.

    No rank marks (though officers had lace borders) were worn on the collar, rank stripes are still only worn on the cuffs.

    Other mis matches can be seen too.

    9D4EE499-46C6-40C3-8371-06E481BF8DB1.jpeg.8d5207c8dc919723bc5a2941bbe4f746.jpeg

    D48CE2C5-898C-4D1C-A66B-9AEF7C3DAC26.jpeg.0c4f1c1d9db335545284e525147d716f.jpeg

     

    Surgeon uniforms had no lace border on the collar. They did however have a distinctive insignia on the collar. 
    Clearly unlike that in the portrait.

    49C0214F-8CCA-4601-939B-69DA9B1CC312.thumb.jpeg.1a51a83f4208ff6dbc2b612d86a27967.jpeg


    6C7D4885-02D0-4A81-9B97-65045E78F8B9.thumb.jpeg.00990635dd51dfbb56a61cc305326541.jpeg

     

    4EA821A9-02F1-48EF-A78C-A6EDB85382AA.thumb.jpeg.3d920b21701f2351b87481bc44029eb8.jpeg

     

    This was all new to me just about.

    However I have to reach the conclusion than your portrait does not show a British or Indian Navy uniform… 🤷‍♂️
    That’s no bad thing in my opinion, it’s an interesting new branch on the family tree waiting to be found.


     

    The only matching uniform I found was that of the US Navy (( as explained/pictured best I can in my previous reply 👍))

     

    That revealed the significance of the acorn & leaves attached to your picture, it is his insignia which is, to this day, still the insignia of the…

    U.S. Navy Medical Corps.

     

     

    & That’s all I’ve got!

     

    cheers

    tony🍻

     

     


    👇 From  GlobalSecurity. Org website 

     

    “ The uniform of the Indian Navy has by and large been inherited from the Royal Navy. In that Service, the uniform has evolved over the past 250 years. At the beginning of the eighteenth century, there was no standard uniform for naval personnel, and each ship conformed more or less to the sartorial whims and fancies of her Captain.

    History records that in 1745 a group of British naval officers decided to petition the Admiralty for an official uniform, as was being worn by other navies. This was done, and the Admiralty directed certain officers to appear in what they considered to be a good design. The final decision was to be left to King George II. 

    One day while riding in Hyde Park, the King caught sight of the Duchess of Bedford, wife of the First Lord; who made a lovely picture dressed in a brand new riding habit. The color of the dress was a dark navy blue, with rows of gold buttons down the front, a white collar, and gold lace on the cuffs. The King was so taken up with this colour scheme that he immediately ordered its adoption for his Navy's uniform. There is some speculation that the colors the Duchess was wearing had been selected by her husband. Be that as it may, this was perhaps why the Navy's winter ceremonial uniform became a dark navy blue with a double row of buttons in front, gold stripes depicting rank on the cuffs, a white shirt with stiff collar, and a black tie. 
    The epaulettes worn by all naval officers owe their origin to the French Navy, which passed them on to the British and thence to many other navies of the world. The epaulette is nothing but a decorative amplification of the shoulder strap, whose original function was to prevent the bandolier from slipping off the shoulder. In the early days, Lieutenants wore only one epaulette on their left shoulder. When in command, however, this epaulette was shifted to the right shoulder.”

     

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Dear Farkas,

    Thankyou so much for all your work and interest in the uniform of the gentleman in my miniature. I really appreciate it.

     

    kindest regards

     

    Ian 

    Hobart Tasmania

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now
    ×
    ×
    • Create New...

    Important Information

    We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.