Jump to content
News Ticker
  • I am now accepting the following payment methods: Card Payments, Apple Pay, Google Pay and PayPal
  • Latest News
    • entries
      78
    • comments
      489
    • views
      82,043

    It's the Gospel


    Brian Wolfe

    3,225 views

    “It’s the Gospel”; a term meaning that something is beyond reproach, to be taken at face value, no questions asked. The Gospel also, of course, refers to a religious book and this is not the topic for debate today. We use the term, perhaps a bit liberally, to mean that any work, especially a work requiring research, is the definitive word on the subject.

     Here we are interested in military history and or collecting artefacts of historical military importance, at least important to the individual collector. In our search for information regarding our chosen areas of interest we might venture out and purchase a book or two or failing that refer to the Internet. Once we have such a book or information gleaned from the multitude of websites far too often we simply file that information away as fact, cold hard unshakeable fact. Accumulate enough of these factoids and you are an authority or expert on the subject; you might even decide to write these down and publish a book of your own, or post them a website or forum such as this one.

     Here’s a hypothetical problem, your research was flawed, for whatever reason you were incorrect about a fact, or two. Someone else reads your work and after a while felt they too would like to write a book and like a virus your error has been passed on, and on and on. As each new author researcher has taken your work as the definitive word on the subject, used your work, and those who followed you, to qualify their own work and now, the “virus” becomes pandemic.  

     We read the work by author “Z” (to indicate author zero in 1966) and take his findings as correct as we might for Author “Y” (in 1975, revised edition in 1988) and then Author  “X” (in 2003, 2010 and again in 2013) as we also purchased their books. I used the term “we” as I too tend to accept the works of researchers who then become authors. Why not, after all they have done the research and we (I) have simply taken the easy path and relied on their hard work. The problem was and still is that they all missed the research done in 1977 by another researcher.

     This is where I feel compelled to state that I am not criticising the work of any of the authors noted (or hinted at to be more accurate) as their work is for the most part completely on the mark. However, we need to remain sceptical and continue to ask questions and look for answers, not simply accept what others tell us is true.

     You cannot take anyone’s opinion either verbal of written as gospel. Well...except for mine of course.

    The sword I have managed to avoid to mention is the 1816 Baker Rifleman’s Sword which I will cover in a proper article later this winter in the section, “Let’s Talk British Swords”. I won’t go through the material found here again in the proper article but rather stick to the history of this very interesting and rare British sword.

     

    Regards

    Brian

     

     

    3 Comments


    Recommended Comments

    Brian:

    First, let me say that I always enjoy reading your blog and your "spot on" comments.  Another fine topic with such a broad expansion into so many different facets. 

    I had watched this a week or two ago and when reading your blog, it reminded me of this great quote.  

    There is a great video on the origins of "Who was Murphy in Murphy's Law"  

    Anyway, about mid way through this video, there is this great quote and I think it sums it up quite well to your statement from above.

     

    "That's a bunch of Crap!.. That's the way rumors get started, by these people...who weren't even there."  "That's the same kind of crap...you get out of guys who were not involved and came in many years after. It's just like Tom Brokaw's book if you'll pardon the analogy here, about the best in breed or something like that." "Well, every guy who wrote his story about World War 2, did it fifty years after it happened. I'm the victim of the same damn thing. I tell it the way I remember it, not the way it happened.  I go back and reread a report that I did fifty-five years ago and I say, hmm, I'd better tell that story a little bit different.  Well, that's human nature. You tell it the way you believe it and that's not necessarily the way it happened. There's nothing more true than that."

    "Guy's become, if you'll pardon the expression, sexual intellectuals.  You know what the phrase is for that? Sexual Intellectuals. Their F*cking know-it-alls, that's what"   -Chuck Yeager

     

    Best Regards,

    JustinG

     

     

    Edited by 2dresq
    Link to comment

    As a theology student my professor, a much published former Naval chaplain, set us an essay, saying that if we could answer that successfully we would be guaranteed  a good degree "Which of the gospel writers was the biggest liar, discuss."

     

    I got a good mark, but  don't want to be burned for heresy.

     

    P

    Link to comment
    ×
    ×
    • Create New...

    Important Information

    We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.