Jump to content
News Ticker
  • I am now accepting the following payment methods: Card Payments, Apple Pay, Google Pay and PayPal
  • Latest News

    Recommended Posts

    Posted

    I would think it commemorates the alliance between the AH empire and the German empire during WW1

    It would certainly seem so from the portraits on the ring. However, the story told for three generations is that the ring was a mark of supporting the Austrian war effort during WWI. More specifically, the lady who wore it was said to have donated her jewelry to the state and in return she received or bought this ring. Does anyone have a similar story?

    Posted

    I think these sorts of things are not uncommon. Generally described as 'I gave gold for iron' campaigns? l've seen lots of German trinkets with that sort of political slogan or idea. I don't think it was always jewlery, but also included medalions, table medals, etc. I just googled 'gold for iron WWI' to see if anything came up and the following site was returned, which appears to be about an exhibit on the subject at the Croatian History Museum in Zagreb, which of course would make it part of an Austro-Hungarian drive.

    http://www.hismus.hr/english/current%20exhibition.htm

    I don't really know for sure but I don't remember seeing similar campaigns in France, England, or the US, so maybe it was a Central Powers thing? Anyway, if you google the words I mentioned earlier you will get tons of useful links.

    Posted

    I would think it commemorates the alliance between the AH empire and the German empire during WW1

    The left portrait is H?tzendorf, not Wilhelm. Pure Austrian.

    Posted

    I think these sorts of things are not uncommon. Generally described as 'I gave gold for iron' campaigns? l've seen lots of German trinkets with that sort of political slogan or idea. I don't think it was always jewlery, but also included medalions, table medals, etc.

    Thanks for the confirmation. Their donation was indeed described as "they gave their gold", without the "iron" part but understandable after so many years.

    Do you know if the 'gold for iron' campaigns were state organised or local initiatives? And were the trinkets and the jewellery official issues or only local design/manufacture?

    Posted

    The left portrait is H?tzendorf, not Wilhelm. Pure Austrian.

    There are two crowns on the two sides of the effigies. The one to the right appears to be the Imperial Crown of Austria, while the one to the left looks very much like the German State Crown. If the left portrait is not that of Wilhelm II, what is the meaning of the latter crown?

    Posted (edited)

    If the left portrait is not that of Wilhelm II, what is the meaning of the latter crown?

    It is difficult to see from the pictures, but if the crown on the right side of the portraits is the Austrian Crown, then from what I can see the crown on the left bears some passing resemblance to the Hungarian Crown (the Crown of St. Stephen). It is difficult to see whether the cross on top of the crown is completely vertical, or slightly tilted, but there is quite a bit of Austro-Hungarian imagery that emphasized the 'two kingdoms' nature of the empire.

    Below is the current crest of Hungary with the Crown of St. Stephen on top for comparison.

    Edited by KeithB
    Posted

    I'am shure the ring depicts Franz Josef AND Emperor Wilhelm (btw he has birthday today).

    The soldiers in the first picture shown wear PICKELHAUBEN an absolutely clear indicator for imperial german army and

    in case of reading of this rings mesage - imperial german participation. so this is a typical alliance-ring (waffenbr?derschaftzs-ring)from 1915

    haynau

    Posted

    It is difficult to see from the pictures, but if the crown on the right side of the portraits is the Austrian Crown, then from what I can see the crown on the left bears some passing resemblance to the Hungarian Crown (the Crown of St. Stephen). It is difficult to see whether the cross on top of the crown is completely vertical, or slightly tilted, but there is quite a bit of Austro-Hungarian imagery that emphasized the 'two kingdoms' nature of the empire.

    The cross is completely vertical and the whole shape of the crown appears to be different from that of the Crown of St. Stephen.

    crownonringgz6.jpg

    Posted

    so this is a typical alliance-ring (waffenbr?derschaftzs-ring)from 1915

    Can you give some more details about these rings? Would they be worn by a lady? Were they used as marks for the 'I gave gold for iron' campaigns?

    Posted (edited)

    If it is PRUSSIA & AUSTRO-UNGARIA, I am surprised they did not manage to work in the Prussian eagle into the design. :P

    But I believe it comes under the heading of Patriotika :beer:

    Kevin in Deva :D

    Edited by Kev in Deva
    Posted (edited)

    Can you give some more details about these rings? Would they be worn by a lady? Were they used as marks for the 'I gave gold for iron' campaigns?

    Normaly the were worn by men, but we can ask Carol I about his rings diameter. IMHOit is socalled patriotika, rings, brooches etc bought to express overhelming patrotic feelings. On the rings for the gold for iron campaigns that i know thre is alway engraved gold gab ich f?r eisen.

    Haynau

    RINGS

    Edited by haynau
    Posted

    Oh, jeez, goofed again :blush: Didn't notice the German crown or Pickels. I guess it must be Willi.

    Posted

    Normaly the were worn by men, but we can ask Carol I about his rings diameter. IMHOit is socalled patriotika, rings, brooches etc bought to express overhelming patrotic feelings. On the rings for the gold for iron campaigns that i know thre is alway engraved gold gab ich f?r eisen.

    Thanks for the update. I do not have the ring, so I cannot check its inner diametre (I only took the photos), but I guess it has somewhere around 16-17 mm. The only other piece of information I can bring right now is that the lady who owned it was married to an army officer.

    One more photo, with the inner markings:

    ringis6.jpg

    I can only make out GES.GESCH. and JW.

    • 3 months later...
    Posted

    The collar could be one of several colors from the BW photo - I would venture to guess that he is Artillery. His rank is that of Corporal.

    Posted

    The collar could be one of several colors from the BW photo - I would venture to guess that he is Artillery. His rank is that of Corporal.

    Thanks Hunyadi.

    On a site on the Austro-Hungarian Army I have found the information below.

    Corporal (two six pointed white stars on the collar or collar patch)

    korporal.JPG

    Lieutenant (two embroidered six pointed silver or gold stars)

    oberleutnant.jpg

    It is hard to tell from the picture whether the stars are applied or embroidered. Were there any other differences between the insignia of corporals and lieutenants other than the material of the stars? The family references to him are somewhat vague three generations later: "member of the military postal service for many years".

    Posted

    It is hard to tell from the picture whether the stars are applied or embroidered. Were there any other differences between the insignia of corporals and lieutenants other than the material of the stars? The family references to him are somewhat vague three generations later: "member of the military postal service for many years".

    I usually have a bit of trouble extracting some of the details and color information from B&W photos but in this case I think I have seen enough of these so that I would agree with hunyadi that they are the corporal's stars. The officer's stars usually appear a bit more 'fuzzy' for lack of a better word, and in my experience always photograph with a distinctly grayish hue.

    Posted

    I usually have a bit of trouble extracting some of the details and color information from B&W photos but in this case I think I have seen enough of these so that I would agree with hunyadi that they are the corporal's stars. The officer's stars usually appear a bit more 'fuzzy' for lack of a better word, and in my experience always photograph with a distinctly grayish hue.

    Thanks Keith for your input. The contrast in the photo I posted before was altered. Below is a close-up of the stars from a photo of the original photo. :blush:

    starsvz7.jpg

    For other details I'd have to take a look at the original with a magnifying glass, but that will have to wait for some while.

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now
    ×
    ×
    • Create New...

    Important Information

    We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.