ksg Posted February 5, 2007 Share Posted February 5, 2007 (edited) I finaly got the last pice, a nice Wagner & Sohn "Spange".(note; the items don't belong together, they are only displayed together)Kjell Edited February 5, 2007 by ksg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DavidM Posted February 5, 2007 Share Posted February 5, 2007 HelloCould you please show some photos of the reverse of the 1914 bar please.Many thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ksg Posted February 5, 2007 Author Share Posted February 5, 2007 Here are some closeup pictures. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ksg Posted February 5, 2007 Author Share Posted February 5, 2007 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ksg Posted February 5, 2007 Author Share Posted February 5, 2007 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Biro Posted February 5, 2007 Share Posted February 5, 2007 Congratulations. The EK and the 25 yr oaks are very nice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ksg Posted February 7, 2007 Author Share Posted February 7, 2007 Congratulations. The EK and the 25 yr oaks are very nice.Thanks Biro !Kjell Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dond Posted February 7, 2007 Share Posted February 7, 2007 What about the spange? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gregM Posted February 7, 2007 Share Posted February 7, 2007 (edited) What about the spange?Now thats a question -------There seems to be a debate as to whether these little beauties are good or not.Officially there were supposed to be 969 of these awarded yet I know severalmembers (includeing myself) that own one and they can be found on ebayfairly frequently. So did they make WAY more then they awarded or are therea boat load of fakes floating around?????????I personally hope that some turn out to be good but I know that at least oneof our more knowledgable members believes them to be bad and he has spentalot of time and effort studying them. Edited February 8, 2007 by gregM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dond Posted February 7, 2007 Share Posted February 7, 2007 So what does a good one look like then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tim Tezer Posted February 7, 2007 Share Posted February 7, 2007 So what does a good one look like then?If you ask five different collectors that question, you'll get five different answers. Since there are so many of them around, it's reasonable to assume that some of them are fakes. But there is no concensus on which ones are correct and which ones are fake. This is one case where the fakers have actually succeeded in clouding the matter so completely that an absolute certainty may be impossible to arrive at. My personal take on it is that there is one type I see more commonly than any other type, and I would avoid it.Tim Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ksg Posted February 15, 2007 Author Share Posted February 15, 2007 The big problem whit these things are; if you don?t have one known authentic piece to compare whit, the next best thing you can do is to study pictures. If it?s 100 % identical to the pictures you can find in the best books available, your conclusion is, this must be an authentic piece.I hope this one is!!Kjell Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now