Alfred Posted February 24, 2007 Posted February 24, 2007 I am not totally sure, but I didn?t like it. It seems to be, that the deatails are blurred and not crisp.regardsAndreas
Belaruski Posted February 25, 2007 Posted February 25, 2007 (edited) Andreas, the goggles look clearer in the third picture.However I think the way the pictures crop the bottom of the medal (on the in focus pictures) and that the others are slightly out of focus casts doubt.If it's a copy it's quite a good one though. Edited February 25, 2007 by Belaruski
Christophe Posted February 25, 2007 Posted February 25, 2007 I agree. Looks bad. And I don't like the holes in the left arm and hand.Ch.
Belaruski Posted February 25, 2007 Posted February 25, 2007 I still think from the pictures that are actually in focus, particularly no3. The detail is surprisingly sharp.I think what can sometimes happen is that we see so many fakes we become suspicous of absolutely everything!I'll be honest I'd be curious who was selling this and for how much (and want more in focus pictures), before giving a definite opinion.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now