Stogieman Posted August 5, 2005 Posted August 5, 2005 WW1 FG Enlisted Flieger Board. No unit number, no missing metal numbers. Odd shaped wings. No glow. Thick "buckram" rough-weave stiffener and crispy thin brown paper that the red has been sewn right through.... Sew-on style, unused. One moth nip on the back. Otherwise pretty clean! Weird, weird, weird.
Ralph A Posted August 6, 2005 Posted August 6, 2005 Do you think it may at one time have had a strap? The end looks uneven.
Guest Rick Research Posted August 7, 2005 Posted August 7, 2005 It was either cut off a shoulder seam (no stitching holes in the petrified paper underlay beneath the Feldgrau top that anchored the branch device pattern) or was unworn. I still have it (along with those Fredman von Hofrichten photos) until Evil Ricky picks them up tomorrow from this week's scannings.
Stogieman Posted August 7, 2005 Author Posted August 7, 2005 as much as I'd like to have this one be real, Tony & Kaiser say no way
Guest Rick Research Posted August 7, 2005 Posted August 7, 2005 Ah! And THAT would be why I've never seen one that looks like this!So, who is making such artfully contrived "aged" mock relics? What FIEND forces innocent mothikinses to chomp his foul product?
Mike Dunn Posted August 10, 2005 Posted August 10, 2005 Maybe iit is an OLD fake! WWI was a long time ago! Bugs had plenty of time to get to it like they have most things from that time frame. Mike
Stogieman Posted August 29, 2005 Author Posted August 29, 2005 The only good thing I can say about this piece is it was cheap.
Chip Posted September 27, 2005 Posted September 27, 2005 If Tony & Kaiser said this is a bad piece, I have to disagree with them. It is perfectly all right. Everthing that is "wierd" about it is because it is not an issue piece. The material on the inside is papercloth (Papiergarn), commonly used as a stiffener in private purchase examples. I have seen it many times and probably have an example or two in my collection. This piece is 100% good.Chip
Guest Too many forums Posted September 28, 2005 Posted September 28, 2005 My concern was not with the papercloth backing. It was with the heavy issue quality grey wool, on what is a M1910 private purchase strap. A private purchase strap from heavy issue quality wool concerns me as they are nomrally a higher quality wool. What appears to be dark green wool backing is not typical for an original strap and is also very odd. I am also concerned about a hand-embroider propeller being too large for the strap, so that the edge stitching had to be smashed over the wing tips. These factors, combined with the flood of fake Flieger straps with hand-embroider propellers from the UK, led me to suggest that Rick be very cautious. After all, it is hard to tell from a photo.
Chip Posted September 28, 2005 Posted September 28, 2005 No worries with this piece. There is no flood of Flieger straps that I know of. Yes, there are fakes, but most of them are the same, coming from the same source and quite easy to identify. I have not seen any fakes with piping. All the fakes I have seen are unpiped M07/10 examples. The really scarey area is Flieger officer's boards, which are easily assembled with original parts. You can stick an original Flieger insignia on about any kind of board, as many officers continued to wear the boards of the unit that they came from. What I would like to find is an issue example of this strap. I have other Verkehrstruppen enlisted straps that are Feldgrau with light gray piping, but none from the Fliegertruppen. Still looking....Chip
Daniel Murphy Posted November 1, 2005 Posted November 1, 2005 (edited) I have a 2nd Garde Uhlan Friedensrock for a Leutnant that was seconded to the air service. The feldgrau wool is so coarse as to be almost overcoat wool. I actually removed some wool from a mothed 1917 overcoat to do a couple of small repairs on it. The wool matched perfectly in color and texture. The red Cuffs and collar with their fine gold bullion Litzen, on the other hand, is very high quality (pre war quality) wool. There is no doubt in my mind that my uniform and your shoulder board were manufactured in 1917-18, since the quality of the wool during that time was poor. On issue uniform wool, nettle and other fibers were being used to "stretch" the wool. This is one of the reasons that the late war uniforms are so dark, the ersatz fibers were hard to dye and a darker dye was required. As far as the early red wool, many people do not know that half of the wool manufactured in 1915 was for the prewar "dunkelblau" uniforms. The retailers expected the war would be over very shortly, and that there would be a need for more pre war type uniforms. This may be one of the reasons for the authorization of the Friedenrocks. All of that wool sitting unused would have been a waste of a valuable resource. When the Friedenrocks were ordered instead of a Waffenrock or Bluse, it saved a certain amount of Feldgrau wool, which was needed for officers and soldiers in the field. This may not seem like much material, but multiplied by the tens of thousands (or more) of uniforms made, this was a considerable savings.Dan Murphy Edited November 1, 2005 by Daniel Murphy
Stogieman Posted November 3, 2005 Author Posted November 3, 2005 Interesting Danbiel. Wish I could find the darn thing... my office has 'swallowed it"......
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now