Jacques Posted August 13, 2005 Posted August 13, 2005 this badge takes the tradition of the former "Leihusaren". It consists on a jawless skull . It was worn until the WW1 in the 1rst & 2nd Leib Husaren Rgt, and then during the "Reichswehr" thus the Wehrmacht (see the diagram).The skull was worn on the cap between the cocarde or between the wreath and the eagle. Several types exist depending the availability and were worn ( panzer collar type skull, 1rst SS pattern skull), but one is typical to the cavalerie.
Jacques Posted August 13, 2005 Author Posted August 13, 2005 Here worn by a member of a Reconnaissance unit
Jacques Posted August 13, 2005 Author Posted August 13, 2005 Worn by members of a K.R. at a NCO course
Guest Rick Research Posted August 14, 2005 Posted August 14, 2005 This design has always struck me as blatantly weird-- there being no jawbone, there was nothing to hold those lower teeth "on!"
Bob Hunter Posted September 1, 2005 Posted September 1, 2005 (edited) Jacques & Robin: Killer crushers! Now, was that device worn by all imperial husaren? Edited September 1, 2005 by Bob Hunter
Jacques Posted September 1, 2005 Author Posted September 1, 2005 Now, was that device worn by all imperial husaren?← No, as you can see on the genealogy organigram, it was worn by few units, those in green or red.jacques
Jacques Posted September 1, 2005 Author Posted September 1, 2005 This one is particular. I picked it up on the net and if the owner is there and want I removed it, just ask me. the guy was enlisted to the IR 17, but he is wearing the Leibhusaren skull. No good skull available, he was a former cavalry man ? Don't know the eason but very interesting picture.
Robin Lumsden Posted September 1, 2005 Posted September 1, 2005 This design has always struck me as blatantly weird-- there being no jawbone, there was nothing to hold those lower teeth "on!" ←Rick.There is only one set of teeth.What looks like the top set is in fact meant to be the skull cavities into which the teeth fit - if you get my drift.Looks like two rows of teeth - but only one.
Robin Lumsden Posted September 1, 2005 Posted September 1, 2005 The single row of teeth become clearer in this (earlier) version of the totenkopf.
joe campbell Posted September 1, 2005 Posted September 1, 2005 from a medical standpoint, the last pictureis... uh... more anatomically correct.please refer to your nearest skull orcadaver.it certainly is more aesthetically pleasing.joe
Robin Lumsden Posted September 1, 2005 Posted September 1, 2005 Joe.THIS is what I call aesthetically pleasing.........
joe campbell Posted September 1, 2005 Posted September 1, 2005 Joe.THIS is what I call aesthetically pleasing......... ←teeth and "teeth channels" or not,i'll take it!!you've got some MARVELOUS pieces, robin!joe
dragonreborn Posted November 13, 2005 Posted November 13, 2005 Robin, stop showing off Great stuff!!!Chuck
DonC Posted November 18, 2005 Posted November 18, 2005 Go to a collecting website, get an anatomy lesson - I LOVE this hobby!Don
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now