Ed_Haynes Posted February 5, 2008 Share Posted February 5, 2008 (edited) Two labor medals, both to Uzbeks, and linked together although they are not a group. And neither is numbered.The first a Medal for Valiant Labor [sic]:Rakhimberdy Temirov Edited February 6, 2008 by Ed_Haynes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed_Haynes Posted February 5, 2008 Author Share Posted February 5, 2008 The award details: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed_Haynes Posted February 5, 2008 Author Share Posted February 5, 2008 (edited) Next, this one to a woman, a Medal for Distinguished Labor: Rukiya Abidova Edited February 5, 2008 by Ed_Haynes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed_Haynes Posted February 5, 2008 Author Share Posted February 5, 2008 The award details: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed_Haynes Posted February 5, 2008 Author Share Posted February 5, 2008 Interestingly, this medal has details written on the reverse of the ribbon that seem to relate to the order, or conditions, or the date of award. This seems strange and does not seem to match with anything I see in the award book. While these things are often "matched-up", it is hard to imagine how something this bizarre would be insinuated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christophe Posted February 5, 2008 Share Posted February 5, 2008 To labor medals, both to Uzbeks, and linked together although they are not a group.The first a Medal for Valiant Labor [sic]:Rakhimberdy TemirovHi Ed,If I'm not wrong, this ribbon seems to be the one of the Medal for 20 Years of the Red Army... Nice medals BTW... Cheers.Ch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christophe Posted February 5, 2008 Share Posted February 5, 2008 Interestingly, this medal has details written on the reverse of the ribbon that seem to relate to the order, or conditions, or the date of award. This seems strange and does not seem to match with anything I see in the award book. While these things are often "matched-up", it is hard to imagine how something this bizarre would be insinuated.Looks also like what the museums write sometimes...Ch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed_Haynes Posted February 5, 2008 Author Share Posted February 5, 2008 Interestingly, these are awarded both to Uzbeks and both by the same edict and on the same date. What was going on in Uzbekistan then?And, as always, great thanks to Rick for translation assistance! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed_Haynes Posted February 5, 2008 Author Share Posted February 5, 2008 Hi Ed,If I'm not wrong, this ribbon seems to be the one of the Medal for 20 Years of the Red Army... Nice medals BTW... Cheers.Ch.Very faded, but maybe . . . maybe. Much "bluer" on the reverse. I think this one was just worn a lot? He was very proud? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed_Haynes Posted February 5, 2008 Author Share Posted February 5, 2008 Looks also like what the museums write sometimes...Ch.Museum legends for such lowly medals? I guess in the USSR anything could happen?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christophe Posted February 5, 2008 Share Posted February 5, 2008 Very faded, but maybe . . . maybe. Much "bluer" on the reverse. I think this one was just worn a lot? He was very proud?You're right!!! That's the right ribbon!!! Cheers.Ch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christophe Posted February 5, 2008 Share Posted February 5, 2008 Museum legends for such lowly medals? I guess in the USSR anything could happen?!Who ever knows... Ch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now