Motorhead Posted July 16, 2008 Posted July 16, 2008 This one dropped in today.....Hessental/Schreiber have written there's a variation with the wrong obverse stamp(from the combatant models).So-the reverse should be the same? Have a look at this one-it looks like the reverse stamp is also different.I'm a bit unsure now what to do.....it's definitely not a casted copy nor a galvano.For comparison the "regular" one at the right.Micha
Schießplatzmeister Posted July 16, 2008 Posted July 16, 2008 (edited) Hello Micha:The cross on the right is an original standard mint-struck non-combatant 1866 campaign cross of course.The piece on the left looks like an interesting die-variation, that is close to the official version. Perhaps it was a replacement die officially made when the first one broke during stamping. Or, perhaps it is a piece for private purchase. It looks like it is probably a period piece however. Best regards,"SPM" Edited July 16, 2008 by Schie?platzmeister
Stogieman Posted July 16, 2008 Posted July 16, 2008 I concur, I've had 2 of the official issues. I see nothing on the left-side piece for alarm.
Motorhead Posted July 16, 2008 Author Posted July 16, 2008 You have noticed the laurel instead of the oakleaf and the different position of the "1866" under the cannon?
Schießplatzmeister Posted July 16, 2008 Posted July 16, 2008 Hello Micha:No, I didn't notice the wreath variation (but it was there for all to see!).Yes, it is interesting that there is a laurel-wreath instead of an oak-wreath, like the piece on the right. I did notice that the eagle's wings had a different number of feathers, that the crowns were different, the lettering was different, and the indentation to the raised rim on the upper-arm where the suspension loop is soldered on.I feel confident then that this is not a modern copy as a modern copy would be undoubtedly cast from an original. This was probably a privately-contracted die. It is interesting to note that the suspension loop approximates that of a mint-struck piece in design.I will have to look at the piece in my collection and my reference literature tonight when I get home.Simply fascinating!Thank you for sharing this piece Micha!"SPM"
RAO Posted July 16, 2008 Posted July 16, 2008 Hi Micha, a truly rare stamp already of Hessenthal and Schreiber described. Congratulations. If you want to sell the times ... o) Greeting Mike
Stogieman Posted July 16, 2008 Posted July 16, 2008 See, just a scarce period variation..... Some things can be faked, some things can be copied. But a really good eye sees quality even when the source is unknown. Period manufacture just shines through sometimes!
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now