Eric Stahlhut Posted September 7, 2008 Posted September 7, 2008 (edited) hi guys, i am considering posting one of these items for trade. before i do so, i wish to be fully certain that they are correct.thank you in advance for your opinions---both positive or negative. sorry for the poor pics. Edited September 7, 2008 by Eric Stahlhut
Eric Stahlhut Posted September 8, 2008 Author Posted September 8, 2008 well, since these items have been viewed by 27 people and nobody can offer an opinion, i guess i won't be putting one of them up for trade. thanks for looking! cheers! :cheers:
joe campbell Posted September 8, 2008 Posted September 8, 2008 i don't know that i'd jump so fast...these are often close calls.they look great to me, but I DON'T KNOWcuff titles too well....paddy keating may have some thoughts,or other cuff fans.give it a little time, eric.joe
Gary B Posted September 29, 2008 Posted September 29, 2008 Eric, Alot of people hesitate on these since the fakes are so good and most of us know so little about these titles (plus they are fairly expensive). As has been mentioned Paddy is probably a good choice to look at these. I would also recommend Eric Queen and Willi Zahn, who are members of another forum which you are also a member of.Gary B
Eric Stahlhut Posted September 29, 2008 Author Posted September 29, 2008 Eric, Alot of people hesitate on these since the fakes are so good and most of us know so little about these titles (plus they are fairly expensive). As has been mentioned Paddy is probably a good choice to look at these. I would also recommend Eric Queen and Willi Zahn, who are members of another forum which you are also a member of.Gary Bhiya, gary! hope all is well with you. thanks for reminding me about these!i'm pretty much a 'non active' member on that forum these days. i popped in the other day to look around and touch bases, but discovered that my mailbox may be disabled and cannot post images. perhaps the fact that i stopped dabbling in militaria for over three years may have had something to do with this... ;-)most of the 'old crowd' from that site seem to maintain a presence on this forum in one fashion or another, and i like it here: it's quite congenial and the breadth of knowledge is simply amazing. anyhow, back to the subject of this thread: i've already shown these years ago, but the pics were even worse than the ones above. how can that be possible? heh... :cheers:
heinrich66 Posted November 5, 2008 Posted November 5, 2008 Hi,i'm sorry, but imo these type of ct's is not pre 45 made. Even this type is shown in books. This type comes usually in nco and officer versions. (Please note my thread about these(explained on a officer example) in the WAF (same user), FJ section)
PKeating Posted November 16, 2008 Posted November 16, 2008 Sorry guys. I only just saw this thread. I concur with heinrich66. The FJR1 cuff title is trying to be like this original example. The FJR2 version is clearly from the same source. Close...but no banana.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now