beertje Posted December 11, 2008 Posted December 11, 2008 Hi,I have never seen this one before.Stamped with Juncker + IMME.Anyone familiar with this?Martin
Scott Posted December 12, 2008 Posted December 12, 2008 I thought the Juncker badges with the "SW68" mark should be zinc?
Tom D. Posted December 12, 2008 Posted December 12, 2008 I like it, a textbook J2, with an overstamped IMME. I too have never seen this before, but looks legit and only confirms that IMME & Juncker indeed had a connection.Scott, I noticed the "68" as well, however we do know of tombak Luft flaks with the Juncker SW68 marking. Clearly this is not a typical Juncker badge as it is overstamped with IMME, and since we still don't really know when Juncker switched to using the SW68 marking an anomoly like this badge is plausible IMO.Tom
Scott Posted December 12, 2008 Posted December 12, 2008 I like it, a textbook J2, with an overstamped IMME. I too have never seen this before, but looks legit and only confirms that IMME & Juncker indeed had a connection.Scott, I noticed the "68" as well, however we do know of tombak Luft flaks with the Juncker SW68 marking. Clearly this is not a typical Juncker badge as it is overstamped with IMME, and since we still don't really know when Juncker switched to using the SW68 marking an anomoly like this badge is plausible IMO.TomThanks Tom - I was unaware of tombac awards with the SW68.
J Temple-West Posted December 12, 2008 Posted December 12, 2008 There have been a few of these double marked badges appear over the past 3 or 4 years, but none, I have to say, with any provenance. Without better pictures I wouldn?t like to give a definitive answer, but would say that the ?SW68? mark looks to be correct.
savarese29 Posted December 13, 2008 Posted December 13, 2008 There have been a few of these double marked badges appear over the past 3 or 4 years, but none, I have to say, with any provenance. Without better pictures I wouldn't like to give a definitive answer, but would say that the "SW68" mark looks to be correct.J,I agree the SW68 marking looks good; however, this would be the first I have ever seen on a J2. I have seen several on the J3 with Tombak eagle and zinc wreath. Thoughts?r/ Mike
Tom D. Posted December 14, 2008 Posted December 14, 2008 Hi guys,We are all obviously thinking the same thing, that it is odd that the SW68 logo is on a J2, however that doesn't automatically make this a reproduction, does it? It is an oddity, but that cannot be the only reason we have to totally dismiss this pilot badge, is it? I doubt there is anyone that can confidently say "the SW68 logo was NEVER applied to a J2 pilot badge". How can any of us be so sure of that? Lets ask another question, when did Juncker start using the SW68 logo?OrDisregarding the maker mark, can you fault this badge on anything else? Hardware, rivets, die characteristics, finish, etc.Tom
Steve K. Posted December 18, 2008 Posted December 18, 2008 Without having it in hand it's always more difficult to make an assessment, however I see nothing wrong with this badge.
beertje Posted January 4, 2009 Author Posted January 4, 2009 Without having it in hand it's always more difficult to make an assessment, however I see nothing wrong with this badge.Thanks all for the comments!! Its indeed an interesting piece...It will be for sale (1.000 EUR incl. reg, shipping) so if someone is interested please PM me.Martin
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now