Jump to content
News Ticker
  • I am now accepting the following payment methods: Card Payments, Apple Pay, Google Pay and PayPal
  • Latest News

    Recommended Posts

    Posted

    From the NYT of 9/22/1914:

    "The Petit Gironde has published a dispatch from Verdun setting forth that french soldiers near that point found a valise belonging to a Prussian officer containing a quantity of little iron crosses strung on black and white ribbons bearing the inscription: 1814-1914".

    These presumably were to have been distributed to German soldiers after the entry of the German army into Paris"

    -shows how the newspapers got it wrong in those days too and that German production of EKs was very,very swift.

    Guest Rick Research
    Posted

    Just goes to show what we've all realized of late--

    the news is much better reported without

    "reporters!" :cheeky:

    Posted

    From the NYT of 9/22/1914:

    "The Petit Gironde has published a dispatch from Verdun setting forth that french soldiers near that point found a valise belonging to a Prussian officer containing a quantity of little iron crosses strung on black and white ribbons bearing the inscription: 1814-1914".

    These presumably were to have been distributed to German soldiers after the entry of the German army into Paris"

    For the entry of Paris the inscription would have been 1871-1914 :cheeky:

    Posted (edited)

    True, but 100 years earlier they were there too, marching under Napoleons' Arc as he was sent off to Elba.

    Indeed! April 10, 1814 :cheers:

    The Prussians were there together with troops from Britain, Austria and Russia.

    Edited by Naxos
    Posted

    wanne see picture's

    not words

    Say "Pretty please with sugar on it!" :P

    If you are referring to the original newspaper story,

    many items in the WW1 era newspapers of the day did not have accompanying pictures.

    Kevin in Deva :beer:

    Posted

    For the US, this was at best a curiosity story, hardly big news, taken from a French newspaper as mere column-filler?

    My guess is that someone saw a "1914" and an "1813" and conflated and cross-bred the two observations.

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now
    ×
    ×
    • Create New...

    Important Information

    We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.