Jump to content
News Ticker
  • I am now accepting the following payment methods: Card Payments, Apple Pay, Google Pay and PayPal
  • Latest News

    Identify this cap badge?


    Thomas W

    Recommended Posts

    No problem. I'm assuming it was a general insignia worn by pretty much all the A/H troops... but I'm far from an expert. Hoping some of the others will pop in with more info. And with the other insignia on the cap hopefully they can nail down a specific unit.

    Good luck!beer.gif

    Dancheers.gif

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hoping some of the others will pop in with more info. And with the other insignia on the cap hopefully they can nail down a specific unit.

    This guy has shoulder-strap numbers (Truppenabzeichen) that have been retouched out by the photographer; I think one of his cap badges has been retouched out, too. I have another photo of a sapper whose shoulder-strap and cap numbers were retouched out. I think my sapper belonged to Sappeur-Bataillon Nr. 61, which was the flamethrower battalion. The unit was pretty secretive, so it makes sense that the numbers on the shoulder straps and cap would be hidden in photos.

    Maybe this guy is a flamethrower sapper, too.

    Edited by Thomas W
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Brave guys to do that sort of thing. One round hit's the tanks and you're a human torch... not a nice way to go.unsure.gifsad.gif

    But makes sense as especially back in those early days of such weapons I can imagine they were very secretive and considered rather an elite type of force.

    Great pic by the way!beer.gif

    Dancheers.gif

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Dan asked me if I had anything on this one - all that I can find is one similar in a auction catalogue - it simply states it was and "eagle head bayonet" so there is nothing unit specific - from the nature of the bayonet being a close combat idea and with the fact that he was in a flamethrower unit - I would make an assumption that this was for stormtrooper units??

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    ...IMHO it is surely not a soldier of SB.61 but a normal "honvéd" soldier (IFJ on his cap kokarde) with Carl-Troops-Cross on his chest, photographed in 1917 (or later). The badge with the A-H coat of arms is a normal patriotic badge, that one next to him in shape of a bayonet is a cap badge (it is no special cap badge for stormtrooper units - it was an universal badge for everyone) - so as the two on the left side of his cap (can´t identify them). There is nothing retouched od his cap, it seems like a zinc made kappenabzeichen. I can´t see anything that would look like a retouch on his shoulder-straps, and I don´t think, that A-H army used numbers on shoulderstraps - as far as I know, there were numbers only on left side of cap and (at least should) on the collar...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The Truppenabzeichen were worn on both shoulder straps as well as the left side of the cap. The number on this strap looks to have been retouched. The k.u.k. Sappeaur-Bataillon Nr. 61 took Hungarian soldiers as well as Austrian, by the way.

    Edited by Thomas W
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Here's my photo of Sapper Markiewicz. His unit is not identified, but his shoulder straps and the side of his cap have been retouched to hide the numbers. Also, he appears to have dark oil stains on his hand. The Austrians used coal-tar oil in their flamethrowers, which could stain the hands. This is the only version of this photo I have. The original is at the publisher's.

    Edited by Thomas W
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Thomas W: I saw it in book from P.Jung (Osprey), but never seen it on a photo or on any original uniform from that time. I still think U have a big Fantasy (take it please not too personal). And I don´t think there was a unit that had soldiers from both countries of monarchy. They were build on the principles of "Ergänzungsbezirke", and none of them included both territories of monarchy.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I'm just going by what I see with my own eyes. I see shoulder patches which have been somehow altered, either by the photographer or by a problem with the negative. The question is why would this alteration affect only the shoulder patches and cap patch?

    Here's what it says in Mollo and Turner's Army Uniforms of World War I (Poole, Dorset: Blanford Press, Ltd. 1977), page 101:

    In 1917 a new system of identifying unit and arm was introduced. Each soldier received five pieces of of gray American cloth on which were stenciled the unit number, letters, or a badge. Two patches were sewn on both the tunic and greatcoat shoulder straps (so that they could be read from the front), and one of the side of the cap. Officers wore the badge on the cap only.

    As for the flamethrower battalion, it recruited sappers from all over the empire, just like the German flamethrower regiment. If it recruited a Hungarian sapper, it's possible that he didn't change his uniform. I posted a photo in another thread of a Bavarian pioneer wearing his Bavarian uniform while serving in the Prussian Garde-Reserve-Pionier-Regiment. Anomalies do happen, you know.

    Here's a sapper of Sapper-Bataillon Nr. 61, wearing Truppenabzeichen on his shoulder straps.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    ...I still think U can´t say from that one photo, that the soldier is from Sappeur-battailon Nr.61 (there is no evidence for saying it). From what is written, all soldiers should have numbers and letters on shoulder straps, but without knowing the letters and numbers is impossible to say to which unit he belonged. And to that cap. There is nothing retouched, its just a zinc made Kappenabzeichen (or patriotic badge).

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I never said that the guy was definitely from the flamethrower battalion. I said that it looked like his shoulder straps were retouched, and I thought his cap badge was retouched, too. That's all. When I play with the contrast of the photo, the badge doesn't get any clearer. It's just an interesting photo. It doesn't matter which unit he's from. We'll never know.

    Edited by Thomas W
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now
    ×
    ×
    • Create New...

    Important Information

    We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.