Brian Wolfe Posted August 22, 2010 Posted August 22, 2010 Hello Everyone, Here is a pair of medals that just arrived the other day. I was a bit apprehensive about the colour of the Friedrick-August Cross ribbon as it so so much different in colour compaired with the ribbon I have on a single Oldenburg Cross. After some interenet research and just simple "surfing" I found several other examples of fading that was close to this colour. Is this a common occurrence with the Oldenburg Cross ribbon? I have included an examle of a modern replacement ribbon to show the vast difference in colour. Regards Brian
Brian Wolfe Posted August 22, 2010 Author Posted August 22, 2010 Here is a photo of the reverse of the group. I feel pretty confident that this is an original group, but being new to Imperial German collecting I'm always a bit nervous about my purchases.
Brian Wolfe Posted August 22, 2010 Author Posted August 22, 2010 This shows the vast difference in the colour between the original and modern replacement ribbon. For a while it drove me crazy looking for a ribbon of the same colour as the original, thinking that this was the wrong medal and I was in for a search for a replacement. This has happened to me before and I thank the membership for their advice on that matter. Regards Brian
M Hunter Posted August 22, 2010 Posted August 22, 2010 (edited) Hello Brian, This looks like a nice example to me. The die that was used in that ribbon has just faded I think. Is the FA Cross an iron example (magnetic)? Best wishes Matt Edited August 22, 2010 by M Hunter
Brian Wolfe Posted August 22, 2010 Author Posted August 22, 2010 Hello Brian, This looks like a nice example to me. The die that was used in that ribbon has just faded I think. Is the FA Cross an iron example (magnetic)? Best wishes Matt Hello Matt, Yes the FA cross is iron, the one on the newly-made replacement ribbon is not. Would that one be a later made specimen and possibly made of zinc? Or am I looking at a reproduction? Regards Brian
M Hunter Posted August 22, 2010 Posted August 22, 2010 Hello Matt, Yes the FA cross is iron, the one on the newly-made replacement ribbon is not. Would that one be a later made specimen and possibly made of zinc? Or am I looking at a reproduction? Regards Brian Hello Brian, As far as I am aware there were both magnetic and non-magnetic FA Crosses...maybe a member can confirm. I cannot tell if your other cross is reproduction or not as I can only see the top cornor of it. Best wishes Matt
Brian Wolfe Posted August 22, 2010 Author Posted August 22, 2010 Hi Matt, I never thought about the single Oldenburg Cross as being a reproduction. However, now you mention it there are some differences between the two. Perhaps this is due to a different manufacturer and/or because it is not made of a ferrous metal (iron). I guess that last statement is really a question. I am interested in knowing your thoughts on these two crosses. Regards Brian
Brian Wolfe Posted August 22, 2010 Author Posted August 22, 2010 This is the reverse view. Thanks again. Regards Brian
M Hunter Posted August 22, 2010 Posted August 22, 2010 (edited) Hi Matt, I never thought about the single Oldenburg Cross as being a reproduction. However, now you mention it there are some differences between the two. Perhaps this is due to a different manufacturer and/or because it is not made of a ferrous metal (iron). I guess that last statement is really a question. I am interested in knowing your thoughts on these two crosses. Regards Brian I prefer the one on the left..... I am no expert on these I am afraid Brian....but I do know there are fakes of these out there. Perhaps another member can assist Brian? I do not want to be telling him the wrong thing. Best regards Matt Edited August 22, 2010 by M Hunter
Brian Wolfe Posted August 22, 2010 Author Posted August 22, 2010 I agree with you Matt, the one on the left is a lot better. There is more definition and the "feel" is just better. I do hope the one on the right is the way it is due to a later manufacture but hope won't save it if the consensus of the membership toward it is negitive. Many thanks for your help Matt. Regards Brian
scottplen Posted August 23, 2010 Posted August 23, 2010 what are your thoughts on this one with I think a private purchace in the face of the enemy bar? is bar good?
Brian Wolfe Posted August 23, 2010 Author Posted August 23, 2010 I like it, what do the more experienced members think? Regards Brian
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now