Jump to content
News Ticker
  • I am now accepting the following payment methods: Card Payments, Apple Pay, Google Pay and PayPal
  • Latest News

    Recommended Posts

    Posted

    Recently got this haube. The plate is original, the big question is if it's orginal to the shell. What is it supposed to be with the mixture of officer parts, Einjähriger? There is a extra outtake for the plate, but coud it be that it just didn't fit the fit the first holes?

    • 2 weeks later...
    • 2 weeks later...
    • 4 months later...
    Posted

    very nice. I bet this pickelhaube was a hard one to find.

    There are few of these plates around. But indeed a pain to find at a decent price.

    How did units get the right to have "different" helmet plates?

    I don't really know the reasons behind it. But I guess it were old regiments with an glorious enough past. Some parts of the 33th and a little bit later the whole of the 34th were given these rights in the middle of the 1800s. Both of them Swedish regiments in pommern since the beginning of 1700s. Later transferred to the prussians after the deal made in june 1815 regarding some territories (we got Norway, shitty trade when considering these guys kept rebelling against us).

    Back to the first post of the topic. Somebody that can help me clarify things?

    Posted (edited)

    Hi,

    yes, not only the (I. & II. Btl.) Füsilier-Regt. Nr.34 - also the 5.& 6. Komp. Füsilier-Regt. Nr.33 was allowed to wear this honor-banner!

    The honor-banner was to recognize the regiments service to the Queen of Sweden and their participation in the Napoleonic wars.

    ;) Best regards,

    Jens

    Edited by KIR
    Posted

    There are few of these plates around. But indeed a pain to find at a decent price.

    I don't really know the reasons behind it. But I guess it were old regiments with an glorious enough past. Some parts of the 33th and a little bit later the whole of the 34th were given these rights in the middle of the 1800s. Both of them Swedish regiments in pommern since the beginning of 1700s. Later transferred to the prussians after the deal made in june 1815 regarding some territories (we got Norway, shitty trade when considering these guys kept rebelling against us).

    Back to the first post of the topic. Somebody that can help me clarify things?

    Possibly connected with it being a convenient time for the King of Prussia to send a friendly statement to the Swedes. Or perhaps there was a marriage somewhere between members of the two royal houses?

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now
    ×
    ×
    • Create New...

    Important Information

    We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.