Chris Boonzaier Posted April 6, 2013 Posted April 6, 2013 OK... here is a question... why is this signed i.V. ... the guy who usually signed here ... actually did always sign.... why is the week this doc was issued in significant? Does anyone know who signed?
speedytop Posted April 6, 2013 Posted April 6, 2013 Hi Chris, Oberst v. Stockhausen (Großer Generalstab > Chef d. GSt d. Chefs d. FEW) He is not the "Chef des Feldeisenbahnwesens", therefore i.V. (signed for) Uwe
Chris Boonzaier Posted April 7, 2013 Author Posted April 7, 2013 Muchos Grazias. I meant, why did someone have to sign i.V. for the Chef that week.... a hint... the chef had something better to do.....;-)
Chris Boonzaier Posted April 7, 2013 Author Posted April 7, 2013 Sorry, error on my part... the man I had in mind was no longer in office at the time, so brain fart on my part. ignore the above. Best Chris
IrishGunner Posted April 7, 2013 Posted April 7, 2013 Sorry, error on my part... the man I had in mind was no longer in office at the time, so brain fart on my part. ignore the above. Best Chris I bet your wife hears that line quite often...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now